On Thu, 08 Jul 2010, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * We decided to refer to the Release Team the question as to
>whether the package is releaseable in its current state.
>
> So, we would appreciate it if you would take a look at this situation
> and decide. When you've decided you should probably set
Processing changes file: gnupg2_2.0.9-3.1+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnupg2_2.0.9-3.1+lenny1_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnupg2_2.0.9-3.1+lenny1_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnupg2_2.0.9-3.1+lenny1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing ch
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 06:15:23PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:23:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:55:43PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > > On freed 16 July
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:23:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:55:43PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > On freed 16 July 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > > I guess that only a manual build of
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:55:43PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On freed 16 July 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > I guess that only a manual build of a binNMU old scheme on hppa will
> > > > save you from having a source
Nico,
am Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 06:22:44PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> I'd like to upload a new git-core package to proposed-updates in order to fix
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590026.
so why exactly do you upload before confirmation?
> +git-core (1:1.5.6.5-3+len
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On freed 16 July 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > I guess that only a manual build of a binNMU old scheme on hppa will
> > > save you from having a sourceful upload and rebuilds on all
> > > architectures. Probably the hppa buildd
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 588464 + pending
Bug #588464 [release.debian.org] pu: package
libnet-sftp-foreign-perl/1.42+dfsg-1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
588464: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
On freed 16 July 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I guess that only a manual build of a binNMU old scheme on hppa will
> > save you from having a sourceful upload and rebuilds on all
> > architectures. Probably the hppa buildd admins (in Cc) can help here?
>
> One issue is that any further updates
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 12:04 -0700, Jack Bates wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 10:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > [...] reading the bug report and looking at the
> > upstream tracker indicates that the fix required for the bug is three
> > lines long -
> > http://issues.outoforder.cc/file_downlo
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 08:29:43PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 12:13 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Switching to libpng 1.4.x for squeeze would require a transition.
>
> You missed the words "rather large" out of the above sentence.
>
> Assuming that I can count, the
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 18:22 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> I'd like to upload a new git-core package to proposed-updates in order to fix
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590026.
>
> This is a security issue but we don't plan to issue a DSA for this. Since
> Gerrit Pape is curr
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:47 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jakub Wilk , 2010-07-22, 11:38:
> >>>It was discovered that VIGRA 1.7.0 (known as libvigraimpex in
> >>>Debian), broke ABI without bumping SONAME.
[...]
> >>>3. Leave SONAME as is, but rename binary package from
> >>>libvigraimpex2ldbl back
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:24:27 +0100
with message-id
<1280258668.25579.822.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#590602: RM: gallery2/2.3.1.dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590602,
regarding RM: gallery2/2.3.1.dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 10:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, July 23, 2010 00:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 08:58:10 -0700, Jack Bates wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, to address bug #577141 in lenny, would you consider an out of bounds
> >> update of the libapache2-mod-gnutls pac
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove gallery2 from testing. There's been no followup to
security bug #564561 for more than seven months.
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
Hi,
I'd like to upload a new git-core package to proposed-updates in order to fix
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590026.
This is a security issue but we don't plan to issue a DSA for this. Since
Gerrit Pape is currently not available from what I know I prepared an NMU for
s-p-
* Jakub Wilk , 2010-07-22, 11:38:
It was discovered that VIGRA 1.7.0 (known as libvigraimpex in
Debian), broke ABI without bumping SONAME. Unforuntaly, the flawed
version has already migrated to testing. As a consequence, lprof, the
only rev-dependency of VIGRA, is currently unusable both in un
18 matches
Mail list logo
