Bug#588464: pu: package libnet-sftp-foreign-perl/1.42+dfsg-1

2010-07-16 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Release Team I'm sorry forgott to reply too on the openend bugreport, so here it is again, below. On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:37:15AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Release Team! > > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:05:32PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org

Re: release-critical bug statistics

2010-07-16 Thread Thomas Hochstein
francis southern schrieb: > I have to confess I don't know what a "britney" is in this context, | For those coming in late, “britney” is the name of the scripts that | manage Debian’s testing distribution; it uses a number of criteria, | including time since upload, number of open bugs, where

Processed: reassign 573426 to release.debian.org, severity of 573426 is normal

2010-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 573426 release.debian.org Bug #573426 [ftp.debian.org] Please remove old lenny netinstaller as it points to missing kernel modules Bug reassigned from package 'ftp.debian.org' to 'release.debian.org'. > severity 573426 normal Bug #573426

Bug#589320: marked as done (nmu: protobuf-c_0.12-3)

2010-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:47:32 +0100 with message-id <1279306052.13915.188.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> and subject line Re: Bug#589320: nmu: protobuf-c_0.12-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #589320, regarding nmu: protobuf-c_0.12-3 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#589320: nmu: protobuf-c_0.12-3

2010-07-16 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 nmu protobuf-c_0.12-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against protobuf >= 2.3.0-2.1" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEY

Re: release-critical bug statistics (was: Debian Project News 2010/05 frozen, please review and translate)

2010-07-16 Thread francis southern
On 16 July 2010 04:11, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Hi! > > Am 12.07.2010 18:43, schrieb Filipus Klutiero: > That section is very confusing. Although I can see how the math was done when looking at the blog post (assuming the numbers need an update), > [..] >> According to the unof

Re: ghc6 6.12.3 and the transition freeze

2010-07-16 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 15.07.2010, 23:10 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy: > On 07/15/2010 10:49 PM, Kari Pahula wrote: > > Replying to debian-release too since they would have a thing or two to > > say about this. > > > > Thanks! > > A haskell transition isn't something we could describe as "a small

release-critical bug statistics (was: Debian Project News 2010/05 frozen, please review and translate)

2010-07-16 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 12.07.2010 18:43, schrieb Filipus Klutiero: >>> That section is very confusing. Although I can see how the math was done >>> when looking at the blog post (assuming the numbers need an update), [..] > According to the unofficial RC-bugs count, the upcoming release, Debian > 6.0 "Squeeze",

Bug#589245: marked as done (nmu: mumble_1.2.2-4)

2010-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:11:50 +0200 with message-id <4c400636.6080...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#589245: nmu: mumble_1.2.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #589245, regarding nmu: mumble_1.2.2-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de