# downgrade severity (does not render package completely unusable)
severity 587830 normal
thanks
Hi Release Team!
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:05:32PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu mumble_1.2.2-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against protobuf >= 2.3.0-2.1"
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testin
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 23:52 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> >> We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most
> >> recent DSA. That was released with the
On 07/16/2010 12:09 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 11:57 PM, dann frazier wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:52:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> We have run into
On 07/15/2010 11:57 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:52:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in t
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:52:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> >> We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most
> >> recent DSA. That was released wi
On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most
>> recent DSA. That was released with the version number 3.1.11-a-6+lenny1,
>> following the usual scheme
On 07/15/2010 10:49 PM, Kari Pahula wrote:
> Replying to debian-release too since they would have a thing or two to
> say about this.
>
Thanks!
A haskell transition isn't something we could describe as "a small
update", it
would take at least two weeks to have it done. We prefer to not start suc
Replying to debian-release too since they would have a thing or two to
say about this.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:08:55PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> As I can see it currently, the state of haskell in testing is quite
> well. So if we’d upload ghc6-6.12.3 to unstable now and do _not_ make it
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most
> recent DSA. That was released with the version number 3.1.11-a-6+lenny1,
> following the usual scheme. However, as it seems hppa had a version that used
> t
Hi release team,
We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most
recent DSA. That was released with the version number 3.1.11-a-6+lenny1,
following the usual scheme. However, as it seems hppa had a version that used
the old binNMU numbering scheme: 3.1.11-a-6.0.1, which
11 matches
Mail list logo