Re: Future requirements for specifying supported Python versionsand transition support

2010-06-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, June 26, 2010 03:46:46 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > one thing that isn't clear for me, what is (or is there any) opinion > > from doko / POX on this? > > I proposed the (optional and stripped down) X-Python-Version / > X-Python3-Version field. > > To be honest, all we want to know i

Re: Bug#587058: RM: clamav/0.96.1+dfsg-1

2010-06-30 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:21:17PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > I don't really care what happens to new packages in volatile. This is > mostly about the removal from Squeeze. > > RMs; the most important packages (clamav and dansguardian) are already > available on volatile. The rest are frin

Re: Bug#587058: RM: clamav/0.96.1+dfsg-1

2010-06-30 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 08:56:51AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:48:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > It's only 3-5 packages more, the rest is either already in volatile, > > packages which could simply drop the clamav support or which should > > be removed entirel

Re: python-twitter package should be removed from testing (Re: all twitter client should support OAuth before they will drop Basic Auth in August

2010-06-30 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 30 juin 2010 à 12:47 +0900, Hideki Yamane a écrit : > Hi, > > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:47:45 -0300 > Mauro Lizaur wrote: > > Python-twitter doesn't seem to be on shape to be released, since the last > > commit is > > from 06/13 and there isn't a single line regarding oauth. > > Also t

python-twitter package should be removed from testing (Re: all twitter client should support OAuth before they will drop Basic Auth in August

2010-06-30 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:47:45 -0300 Mauro Lizaur wrote: > Python-twitter doesn't seem to be on shape to be released, since the last > commit is > from 06/13 and there isn't a single line regarding oauth. > Also the author from oauth-python-twitter (which can be integrated in some > way with

Re: Transition: libjpeg6b with versionned symbols

2010-06-30 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:41:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > I'd say just bump it to 6b1 to avoid spurious ld.so warnings. If > there's no other change than the versioning in the new libjpeg then it > will go in testing in 10 days so shouldn't hold up too much stuff. I reached the same concl

Re: Transition: libjpeg6b with versionned symbols

2010-06-30 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 18:14:45 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:05:54AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 01:28:46 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > > A new upstream release that provides versionned symbols has been released > > > (6b1) and I h

Migration of gdal 1.6.3->1.7.2

2010-06-30 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
Hi It would be a good choice having GDAL library migrating to 1.7 series - already available in experimental since ages - in squeeze. It would involve the following packages: dans-gdal-scripts libgdal-grass grass thuban qgis xastir mapserver merkaartor qlandkartegt mapnik lib

Re: Migration of joystick to testing

2010-06-30 Thread steve
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:08:49 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > joystick has not migrated yet, for a reason I didn't spot originally - > ltsp-client depends on "inputattach | joystick", and neither package now > exists on s390. Indeed, I've just submitted a bug on ltsp-client to add a !s390 qualif