Re: [Bug #579835] libexiv2-6: Very slow on writing to Nikon SLR-images

2010-06-15 Thread Mark Purcell
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 04:52:30 Michael Holtermann wrote: > > It appears that we do require the rebuild of all libs for the Nikon fix > > (ie 0.20) and can't just sneak it on the back of 0.19. > > This sounds like a big task. Could you say something about the timeline? Or > is the fix deferred

Bug#586018: marked as done (nmu: nurpawiki, ocaml-usb)

2010-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:44:46 +0100 with message-id <1276631086.2751.369.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> and subject line Re: Bug#586018: nmu: nurpawiki, ocaml-usb has caused the Debian Bug report #586018, regarding nmu: nurpawiki, ocaml-usb to be marked as done. This

Bug#586018: nmu: nurpawiki, ocaml-usb

2010-06-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu nurpawiki_1.2.3-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild with ocsigen_1.3.3-1" dw nurpawiki_1.2.3-4 . ALL . -m "libocsigen-ocaml-dev (>= 1.3.3-1)" nmu ocaml-usb_1.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild with lwt_2.1.1-1" d

Processed: eclipse: completely broken in Lenny

2010-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 585690 grave Bug #585690 [eclipse] eclipse: JVM terminated at startup with exit code 127 Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' > retitle 585690 eclipse: completely broken in Lenny Bug #585690 [eclipse] eclipse: JVM terminated at start

Re: Haskell, Was: scheduling

2010-06-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Mon, June 14, 2010 22:19, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Montag, den 14.06.2010, 19:14 +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: >> It may be possible to include smaller updates if time allows and they do >> not interfere with ongoing transitions. If your upload would require >> changes to or rebuilds

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-06-15 Thread Mark Purcell
On Monday 07 June 2010 22:24:17 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > A targetted fix for that bug with no ABI change is impossible? > > If the primary reason for proposing the transition now is to pull in the > fix for that bug, then a targetted fix would be much appreciated if > possible (it's one less tra

Processed: unblock 574770 with 585954

2010-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 574770 with 585954 Bug #574770 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults (2.6) Was blocked by: 524746 529478 534068 534848 558983 558996 565665 568892 570580 573161 574730 576210 576225 577061 577388 577898 577900 580148 580678 581

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2010-06-15 Thread Archive Administrator
Processing changes file: cacti_0.8.7b-2.1+lenny3_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ooqwh-0001od...@ries.debian.org