On Saturday 29 May 2010 22:31:28 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Does ekiga require any sourceful changes for the ptlib/opal transition?
> If not then I'll schedule (yet) another set of binNMUs for ekiga so we can
> try and get both transitions ready asap.
Yes ekiga does currently require a sourceful up
On 29/05/10 14:31, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 12:23, Eugen Dedu wrote:
News:
- I have fixed all the appropriate upstream bugs
- I have tested the branches and they are ok from my point of vue, so
they can be packaged to a new release
- but before I am looking at the hppa failure
* Steffen Möller (steffen_moel...@gmx.de) [100529 16:52]:
> On 05/29/2010 02:18 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:13:45AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> >> I'll postpone an email to debian-devel for a week or
> >> two until the workload at Eucalyptus allows upstream
> >> to jo
On 05/29/2010 02:18 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:13:45AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>> I'll postpone an email to debian-devel for a week or
>> two until the workload at Eucalyptus allows upstream
>> to join the thread on that more public list.
>
> Even after reading this
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 11:41:09AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> We don't provide official tarballs with the result of debootstrap.
Well, we don't because deboostrap output is not the main media to use
Debian for our users, I guess. EMIs/AMIs are such a media for users of
some "cloud" infrastruct
Le dimanche 23 mai 2010 à 15:06 +0100, peter green a écrit :
> Package: seed
> Version: 2.30.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Seed fails to build on ia64. Unfortunately I don't have access to an
> ia64 system so I can't debug this myself.
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=seed&arch=ia64&ver
On Wed, May 12, 2010 12:23, Eugen Dedu wrote:
> News:
> - I have fixed all the appropriate upstream bugs
> - I have tested the branches and they are ok from my point of vue, so
> they can be packaged to a new release
> - but before I am looking at the hppa failure
> - as soon as I fix it, I will co
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:29:13PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> This Debian-like self-building is what is happening today and yes,
> we can continue like that. My mail was just thought as an invitation
> to think along, not as a request for anything. If the perfect answer is
> VMbuilder I don't k
On 05/29/2010 11:54 AM, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Stefano Zacchiroli (z...@debian.org) [100529 09:29]:
>> I believe this is the most relevant part for -release. AFAIK the
>> pkg-eucalyptus team already has all the software to create on the fly
>> the needed images and kernel/initrds. The point is th
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:13:45AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> I'll postpone an email to debian-devel for a week or
> two until the workload at Eucalyptus allows upstream
> to join the thread on that more public list.
Even after reading this mail I'm not sure what exactly you are trying to
do.
* Stefano Zacchiroli (z...@debian.org) [100529 09:29]:
> I believe this is the most relevant part for -release. AFAIK the
> pkg-eucalyptus team already has all the software to create on the fly
> the needed images and kernel/initrds. The point is then which work-flow
> do you want to synchronize wi
On 29/05/10 at 11:20 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:19:09AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I think that enabling users to build their own customized images is
> > more in the spirit of doing things the Debian way, and also has the
> > advantage of not adding more wo
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:19:09AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I think that enabling users to build their own customized images is
> more in the spirit of doing things the Debian way, and also has the
> advantage of not adding more work for any core debian team.
I've been told by the pkg-eucaly
On 29/05/10 at 01:13 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> The bottleneck for the selection of Debian as a cloud
> OS (at least for the AWS clouds) is the offering of
> some certified kernel and root images, from which one
> then jumps into "the rest" of Squeeze. Amazon restricts
> that, with Eucalyptus t
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:13:45AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> since today, we have Eucalyptus in the archive, which
> is a Free clone of the Amazon Web Services for computing
> and storage. Stefano wants to tag Squeeze as "cloud
> ready", and, frankly, for the very exact moment nobody
> really
15 matches
Mail list logo