Processing changes file: xserver-xorg-video-intel_2.3.2-2+lenny7_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1obvvh-oh...@ries.debian
Hi,
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 21:23 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> I don't know if that qualifies as a transition but I have three
> packages which need to migrate to testing together:
It technically does, as there's more than one package involved. It's
unlikely to cause anyone except the maintai
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 19:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:22 -0700, Chris Taylor wrote:
> > I am currently in the process of preparing the transition of Audacious
> > to the new 2.3 stable branch. The current highest version in Debian is
> > 2.1 so I am pushing to try to
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >This bug has NOTHING to do with the transition -- the bug would be as
> >good or as bad with python-default being 2.6. May be even it
> >would disappear if 2.6 is the default, we don't know!
> Well, maybe. But I bet I will FTBFS with Python 2.6 as well.
I
* Yaroslav Halchenko , 2010-05-11, 13:31:
Please contact me if you need assistance.
doing so:
This bug has NOTHING to do with the transition -- the bug would be as
good or as bad with python-default being 2.6. May be even it
would disappear if 2.6 is the default, we don't know!
Well, maybe.
Your message dated Tue, 11 May 2010 18:46:54 +0100
with message-id
<1273600014.27409.241.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#570356: transition: directfb - soname change
has caused the Debian Bug report #570356,
regarding transition: directfb - soname change
to be
> > # as per squeeze RC policy, point 4:
> > severity 581204 serious
evil you! ;)
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
doing so:
This bug has NOTHING to do with the transition -- the bug would be as
good or as bad with python-default being 2.6. May be even it
would disappear if 2.6 is the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # as per squeeze RC policy, point 4:
> severity 581204 serious
Bug #581204 [python-nipy] python-nipy: FTBFS on hppa due to undefined symbol:
__canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare while sphinxing
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> block 57
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 574770 with 577388
Bug #574770 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults (2.6)
Was blocked by: 558996 573161 576225 578785 576210 574730 518049 558983 574741
524746 577061 534848 534068 565665 529478 570580 580678 581008 577898
Added
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 14:38:04 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Please remove the following packages from Squeeze, which have open
> security issues for too long.
> If they get cleaned up (possibly by new maintainers/team members)
> that would be good, but for now it's cleaner to remove them:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I uploaded xserver-xorg-video-intel to p-u with a backported patch to
add support for machines with an SDVO LVDS output, without which X
refuses to start. The submitter tested on his hw, and afa
On Tue, May 11, 2010 10:59, nicolas.delv...@gmx.com wrote:
> The "totem-plugin-arte" package need a binNMU on amd64 because
> "libtotem-plparser12" was superseded by "libtotem-plparser17" in both sid
> and testing.
(and the package was in NEW at the time)
Scheduled.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUB
Hi,
The "totem-plugin-arte" package need a binNMU on amd64 because
"libtotem-plparser12" was superseded by "libtotem-plparser17" in both sid and
testing.
No problem with other architectures and no other changes are needed for now.
Thanks !
Nicolas Delvaux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
13 matches
Mail list logo
