Re: SRMs: possibe updates for xulrunner/icedove/kompozer on stable

Hi, On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 09:52 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > In case you don't read my blog, it appears that there were hidden issues > in the mozilla code base on arm, mips, sparc and powerpc. > > Question is: should we update the stable packages with the relevant > patches ? I do read it, but m

please binNMU pynifti to build extensions for 2.6 and drop for 2.4

Hello, binNMU of pynifti is needed to address FTBFS #571499 of nipy (emulating situation whenever python2.6 is the default, which isn't yet the case, so it could be closed with a simple binNMU of pynifti) nmu pynifti_0.20090303.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Build extensions for 2.6 and drop for 2.4.' Thanks!

Re: gettext, autopoint and cvs

(also unsure if you're subscribed) I'd (not a release team member) really like autopoint upstream to move to a more sane design than depending on CVS and embedding a full CVS repository in a tarball in the package. I see two possibilities: Drop the need to store the whole history. This is my pre

Re: gettext, autopoint and cvs

(Not sure you're subscribed, apologies if that's the case.) Santiago Vila (26/02/2010): > Could someone please calculate how many packages currently > build-depend on cvs in unstable? (That would be an upper estimation > of how many packages would I break in unstable by doing this). 67 by my cou

gettext, autopoint and cvs

Hello. I'm considering to move autopoint, from gettext, to a separate package called "autopoint". By popular demand, but also because it is the "right thing" to do if gettext is not going to depend on cvs. (Moreover it would be a nice "Architecture: all" package which would remove about 385K of s

Bug#571550: nmu: openoffice.org-voikko_3.1-2+b1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, the usual bin-NMU round for new OOo versions as -voikko has a strict dependency: [ disclaimer. Not sure about whether to specify +bX here or not, and in the dw case which +bX. ] nmu op

Re: removing swfdec from testing (gnome depends on it)

Le mercredi 24 février 2010 à 23:53 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > The removal won't take effect until the new meta-gnome2 is ready to > transition, removing the dependency from g-d-e; that currently appears > to be blocked by gnash FTBFS on ia64 and banshee being unbuildable on > kfreebsd-*.

Re: binNMUs for hdf5

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:39:32PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Thomas Weber writes: > > please schedule the following binNMUS: > > Done. Thanks. Now, two more nmu octave-communications . ALL . -m "Rebuild against hdf5" dw octave-communications . ALL . -m "octave-signal (>= 1.0.10-2)

Bug#571435: marked as done (BinNMU lablgtkmathview and matita on all arches)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:03:38 +0100 with message-id <87mxyx2nwl@solon.marcbrockschmidt.de> and subject line Re: Bug#571435: matita: FTBFS: /bin/sh: query: not found has caused the Debian Bug report #571435, regarding BinNMU lablgtkmathview and matita on all arches to be marked as

Processed: Re: Bug#571435: matita: FTBFS: /bin/sh: query: not found

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 571435 release.debian.org Bug #571435 [src:matita] inconsistent assumptions over implementation GdomeInit Bug reassigned from package 'src:matita' to 'release.debian.org'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions matita/0.5.8-2. > retitl

Re: Bug#571435: matita: FTBFS: /bin/sh: query: not found

reassign 571435 release.debian.org retitle 571435 BinNMU lablgtkmathview and matita on all arches thanks Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > I think that the relevant part is rather: > > OCAMLOPT matita.ml > File "matita.ml", line 1, characters 0-1: > Error: Files /usr/lib/ocaml/lablgtkmathview/lablgtkmat

Bug#571409: marked as done (give-backs for haskell-cgi)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:38:59 +0100 with message-id <87bpfd4by4@solon.marcbrockschmidt.de> and subject line Re: Bug#571409: give-backs for haskell-cgi has caused the Debian Bug report #571409, regarding give-backs for haskell-cgi to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#571318: marked as done (Dep-Wait all ia64 haskell package)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:02:21 - with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#571318: Dep-Wait all ia64 haskell package has caused the Debian Bug report #571318, regarding Dep-Wait all ia64 haskell package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#571080: marked as done (transition: ocaml)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:45:04 +0100 with message-id <87fx4p4jzz@solon.marcbrockschmidt.de> and subject line Re: Bug#571080: transition: ocaml has caused the Debian Bug report #571080, regarding transition: ocaml to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#571409: give-backs for haskell-cgi

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, haskell-cgi has to be built with a fixed haskell-network: gb haskell-cgi_3001.1.7.1-3 . powerpc s390 dw haskell-cgi_3001.1.7.1-3 . powerpc s390 armel . -m "libghc6-network-dev (>> 2.2.1.7-1)" Thanks

Bug#571318: Dep-Wait all ia64 haskell package

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the current ghc6 compiler is unable to provide working packages on ia64, and a fix is not in sight. I’d like to remove the ia64 build-failure logs from https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php to m