Re: Bug#567811: closed by Matt Kraai (Bug#567811: fixed in python-support 1.0.6.1)

2010-02-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 23 février 2010 à 18:48 +0100, Bastian Blank a écrit : > found 567811 0.8.4lenny1 > thanks > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 04:18:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > update-python-modules does not reset umask while generating the contents > > of /usr/lib/pymodules. > > Lenny is

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2010-02-23 Thread Archive Administrator
Processing changes file: mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.51a-24+lenny3_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.51a-24+lenny3_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.51a-24+lenny3_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.51a-24+lenny3

Lieliska iespēja saņemt dāvanu!

2010-02-23 Thread ebid
    Jaunā izsoles veikala atklāšana jau 18. februārī! Reģistrējies www.ebid.lv un saņem dāvanā divas likmes bez maksas! Iepazīsties ar izsoles precēm jau tagad un izmēģini veiksmi – varbūt esi vienīgais solītājs! Ja izsoles laikā neatrodies pie datora, lieliska iespēja

Re: HPPA and Erlang packages

2010-02-23 Thread Marc Brockschmidt
"Carlos O'Donell" writes: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Sergei Golovan wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:43 PM,   wrote: >>> Yes, the binary removal is the best option, if the porters are not able >>> to fix this arch-specific problem. I would like to avoid this at all >>> costs, but it mi

Re: HPPA and Erlang packages

2010-02-23 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Sergei Golovan wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:43 PM,   wrote: >> >> Yes, the binary removal is the best option, if the porters are not able >> to fix this arch-specific problem. I would like to avoid this at all >> costs, but it might be the only available solu

Re: Please binNMU dpm and dpm-postgres against updated globus-ftp-client

2010-02-23 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Mattias Ellert writes: > lör 2010-02-13 klockan 09:52 +0100 skrev Luk Claes: >> Mattias Ellert wrote: >>> nmu dpm_1.7.4.1-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against updated globus-ftp-client.' >>> dw dpm_1.7.4.1-3 . ALL . -m 'libglobus-ftp-client-dev (>= 5.2-1)' >>> nmu dpm-postgres_1.7.4.1-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebui

Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

2010-02-23 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:06:59PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > > gpivtools (apparently pre-depends on libgpiv?) > > I don't see where it has a dep on something provided by hdf5? > Sorry my mistake. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@li

Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

2010-02-23 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
"Francesco P. Lovergine" writes: [hdf5 binNMUs] > AFAIK there are still missings: > > gnudatalanguage No idea how I forgot that. Done now. > mpb Was in the list, already done :) > gpivtools (apparently pre-depends on libgpiv?) I don't see where it has a dep on s

Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

2010-02-23 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:34:25PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 20:19 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:4

Bug#571010: marked as done (please give back hdbc-odbc/armel)

2010-02-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:34:55 +0100 with message-id <87sk8s89sw@solon.marcbrockschmidt.de> and subject line Re: Bug#571010: please give back hdbc-odbc/armel has caused the Debian Bug report #571010, regarding please give back hdbc-odbc/armel to be marked as done. This means that

Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

2010-02-23 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 20:19 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100: >> > >What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be >> > >

Bug#571080: transition: ocaml

2010-02-23 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Stéphane Glondu writes: > I was wondering the other day how big a hint could be :-) Here is a > (not so) easy hint for OCaml transition. It won't work, as ocaml is, via graphviz (building libgv-ocaml and libgv-php) bound to the PHP5.3 transition. PHP is in turn bound to hdf5 (via mapserver). I'm

Bug#571080: transition: ocaml

2010-02-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, I was wondering the other day how big a hint could be :-) Here is a (not so) easy hint for OCaml transition. Disclaimer: it is semi-automatically generated, and untested... but my

SRMs: possibe updates for xulrunner/icedove/kompozer on stable

2010-02-23 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, In case you don't read my blog, it appears that there were hidden issues in the mozilla code base on arm, mips, sparc and powerpc. Question is: should we update the stable packages with the relevant patches ? Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.or