Upcoming Python Transition

2009-12-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If we finish preparations in the next week, are there any ongoing transitions a python2.6/python- defaults upload would entangle that would cause the release team to wan

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

2009-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:39:39PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > This looks like a fairly likely reason: > http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/gnome-core > For some reason the package was forced to testing even though it was not > available on all architectures. > If that is the reason, then it means

Re: [OSRM] D-I kernel updates

2009-12-17 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 08:31:02PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > Please accept the new kernel udebs (linux-kernel-di-*-2.6) I've just > uploaded for Etch. done (pending next queue run) > After that I guess another run to process p-u-new by FTP masters will be > needed to get them in the archive. >

[OSRM] D-I kernel updates

2009-12-17 Thread Frans Pop
Please accept the new kernel udebs (linux-kernel-di-*-2.6) I've just uploaded for Etch. After that I guess another run to process p-u-new by FTP masters will be needed to get them in the archive. After that I will upload debian-installer for both stable and oldstable. Cheers, FJP signature.a

Re: [(old)stable] D-I kernel updates

2009-12-17 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > Hi Dann, > > I'm preparing to upload a new version of D-I for both stable and oldstable > and was wondering whether or not to update the kernel udebs. > > Are the current kernel images in (o-)p-u the versions intended for the next > p

Re: [(old)stable] D-I kernel updates

2009-12-17 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 17 December 2009, dann frazier wrote: > p-u still needs an update, so I wouldn't bother there. The bits in OK > o-p-u are candidates for the next oldstable release, though I believe > they add no additional hardware support. Feel free to resync them > though. Given that there's sever

[(old)stable] D-I kernel updates

2009-12-17 Thread Frans Pop
Hi Dann, I'm preparing to upload a new version of D-I for both stable and oldstable and was wondering whether or not to update the kernel udebs. Are the current kernel images in (o-)p-u the versions intended for the next point releases? Anything in them worth the effort? p-u has 2.6.26-20; o-p

Re: quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch

2009-12-17 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Adam, Thanks for the update! On 15 December 2009 at 19:40, Adam D. Barratt wrote: | [CCs to ftp-master and Torsten dropped as this has become a -release | issue again] | | On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 12:51 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > On 12 December 2009 at 13:53, Torsten Werner wrote: | > | D