Christian Perrier wrote:
> As libiw29-udeb has been replaced by libiw30-udeb, it is my
> understanding that netcfg might need a binNMU.
>
> Unless this is done, D-I is not buildable in unstable.
binNMUs scheduled.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
As libiw29-udeb has been replaced by libiw30-udeb, it is my
understanding that netcfg might need a binNMU.
Unless this is done, D-I is not buildable in unstable.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> Please remove kcheckgmail from testing and stable.
> The package is currently useless because gmail broke the login interface.
removal hint added.
> I've filed #561059 against the package to track it.
>
> I'll try to get the new version which fixes the issue
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
Please remove kcheckgmail from testing and stable.
The package is currently useless because gmail broke the login interface.
I've filed #561059 against the package to track it.
I'll try to get the new vers
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 15:02 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:40 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> >> Now that I have uploaded dovecot 1.2.8, dovecot-antispam will need a
> >> binNMU to continue working properly. (See bug #54
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 22:44 +, Arnaud Cornet wrote:
> Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 13:28 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > Do you consider that all of the bugs in question are important enough to
> > be fixed in stable with no likelihood of breaking existing
> > installations? The co
Hello,
On sekmadienis 13 Gruodis 2009 19:33:01 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 13:55 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > several users have been bugging me to fix #512847 [1]. Current amarok
> > version in lenny does not display anything in the Wikipedia tab because
> > wiki
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 13:55 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> several users have been bugging me to fix #512847 [1]. Current amarok version
> in lenny does not display anything in the Wikipedia tab because wikipedia has
> changed its site layout a bit since 1.4.10 release. The patch to fix this
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 14:03 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> please unblock debian-edu-install, it contains two udebs not used by the
> debian-installer by default.
Otavio confirmed on IRC that he's happy to let britney handle migrating
debian-edu-install. I've made that change, so d-e-i shoul
retitle 554447 RM: electricsheep/2.6.8-9
tags 554447 - moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 15:53 -0500, Roberto C.Sánchez wrote:
> Hi. My apologies for not responding earlier. I think that removal from
> Lenny is the best thing, for two reasons:
>
> 1. The new electricsheep package depends
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 554447 RM: electricsheep/2.6.8-9
Bug #554447 [release.debian.org] "electricsheep broken for new installations on
lenny"
Changed Bug title to 'RM: electricsheep/2.6.8-9' from '"electricsheep broken
for new installations on lenny"'
> tags
On Sunday 13 December 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> My only comment was that the diffs would have been easier to review
> without so many whitespace changes. :-)
Yes. As explained in my initial mail, that was a deliberate choice to
decrease the risk of errors by removing them and to make compari
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 18:39 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just uploaded a few packages meant for lenny.
>
>
> glib2.0 (2.16.6-3) stable; urgency=low
[...]
> totem (2.22.2-6) stable; urgency=low
[...]
> gnome-system-tools (2.22.0-4) stable; urgency=low
For the record, these hav
[CC list trimmed]
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 12:30 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > A)
> >
> > * Fix in stable
> > (This will probably not break any existing configurations, it will just
> > keep links that were removed before)
> >
> > Pro: would help fast
> > Pro: no side effetcs
> > Con: doe
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 09:33 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 28 November 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Unless there are objections I will also backport the changes for Etch as
> > that version has the same issues and I think it's worth having the
> > better support for installs from archive.d.o a
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 20:23 +0100, Maximilian Gass wrote:
> I prepared a fix for the roundup regression that was introduced by a security
> update. A member of the security team suggested I use p-u for this:
[...]
> I have attached the source package diff for your review. If this is okay, I
> will
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 11:35 -0300, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> I've been looking at bug #545358, it's a bug that only affects lenny, making
> system-tools-backends quite useless (and also network-admin, shares-admin and
> time-admin from gnome-system-tools).
>
> By quite useless I mean, networ
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 17:48 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> I have prepared a 0.6.7.2 version which can be found here: [2], [3]. The
> debdiff is attached (9 source files changed, 133 insertions and 151
> deletions).
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 16:36 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Please approve a stable update to fix CVE-2007-1084 (#556271).
> According to the bug reporter (Michael Gilbert) this is not a severe
> problem (no DSA will be issued), but fixes for stable and oldstable are
> warranted.
Please go ahead.
R
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 17:22 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> This is the same issue and fix as reported in #560185.
> Please approve, thanks.
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
[Arthur de Jong]
> I it OK to upload this to proposed-updates?
Did you get any feedback on this? This issue is one of the blocking
issues for the next Debian Edu release, and thus it would be nice to
know the timeline for a fix in Lenny. :)
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSC
Dear Release Team,
I'm in the process of implementing symbol versioning for the FFmpeg
library. This work is done in coordination with upstream, but as FFmpeg
is a rather complex set of libraries, this (probably) needs to be done
in coordination with the Debian Release Team as well.
Short recap:
22 matches
Mail list logo
