Bug#548969: nmu: libtorrent-rasterbar_0.14.6-1

2009-09-29 Thread Cristian Greco
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, libtorrent-rasterbar 0.14.6-1 should be binNMUed on some arches due to the boost-defaults package not yet updated to boost1.40 at the time package was building. nmu libtorrent-rasterbar

Re: Scheduling Perl 5.10.1

2009-09-29 Thread Luk Claes
Niko Tyni wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:35:27PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 08:09:56PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Sorry for not having answered sooner, though it's unfortunately not so straightforward to ack or deny such a request. >>> Do you have an idea how we can fix

Re: Scheduling Perl 5.10.1

2009-09-29 Thread Niko Tyni
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:35:27PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 08:09:56PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Do you have an idea how we can fix the ICE? > > Not yet, sorry. The obvious first try is to lower the optimization > level. I'm looking into it (but any help is obviously ap

Bug#547414: pu: package movabletype-opensource/4.2.3-1+lenny1

2009-09-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 21:08 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 08:18:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Were the changes to debian/postinst intended to be included as part of > > the diff? They refer to a package version

Re: Scheduling Perl 5.10.1

2009-09-29 Thread Niko Tyni
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 08:09:56PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Niko Tyni wrote: > > Do you have any preference about the timing of the sid upload wrt. > > other transitions or shall I just go ahead and do it? > > Apparently you uploaded already, disturbing some existing transitions as > well as hav

Re: postfix update for stable

2009-09-29 Thread Luk Claes
LaMont Jones wrote: Sorry for the late reply. > After discussions with the affected security teams (debian and ubuntu), > postfix 2.6.5.3 was uploaded to sid, with the presumption that I would > contact -release to get the fix for my ancient screwup into the next > point release. > > * SECURIT

Re: Proposed release goal: python 2.6 by default

2009-09-29 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 à 19:55 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > AFAIK the maintainer does also want to have python 2.6 as default for > Squeeze, but does not want to upload 2.6 before some preconditions are > met. Indeed, so it means we all agree on the release goal itself, despite the disagreem

Re: Scheduling Perl 5.10.1

2009-09-29 Thread Luk Claes
Niko Tyni wrote: > Hi release team, > > I believe perl 5.10.1-2 in experimental is ready for sid and hopefully > squeeze too. The problems I found in my rebuild tests can be seen at > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-p...@lists.debian.org&tag=perl-5.10.1-transition

Re: Proposed release goal: python 2.6 by default

2009-09-29 Thread Luk Claes
Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 à 19:33 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit : >> Release Goals are not a stick to make the maintainer of python 2.6 to >> upload his package to unstable. > > No, they are a way to express what the project as a whole wants > something to happen for the

Re: Proposed release goal: python 2.6 by default

2009-09-29 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 à 19:33 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit : > Release Goals are not a stick to make the maintainer of python 2.6 to > upload his package to unstable. No, they are a way to express what the project as a whole wants something to happen for the release. Why should this be relat

Re: Proposed release goal: python 2.6 by default

2009-09-29 Thread Andreas Barth
* Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org) [090929 11:58]: > there is already broad agreement that this should be the case, so I’d > like to submit Python 2.6 being the default as a release goal for > squeeze. Release Goals are not a stick to make the maintainer of python 2.6 to upload his package to un

Re: VTK migration

2009-09-29 Thread Luk Claes
Dominique Belhachemi wrote: > Hi, > > is it possible to let the vtk package migrate to testing? > > The package is valid, but some problem with the fsl package pretends it > from migrating automatically. Is this fixable with an "hint"? There is already a hint, the problem is that therion was not

Re: Proposed release goal: python 2.6 by default

2009-09-29 Thread Michael Biebl
Josselin Mouette wrote: > Hi, > > there is already broad agreement that this should be the case, so I’d > like to submit Python 2.6 being the default as a release goal for > squeeze. What exactly does this mean for squeeze: Will we ship 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 or will 2.4 be dropped? Cheers, Michael P

Webinar (free sign-up) on Google ranking: Top 10 SEO Tools

2009-09-29 Thread Jason McDonald
Good day, I came across your company in my research on potential firms and marketers (ad agencies, PR firms) that may be active in "Internet Marketing," including S.E.O. or Search Engine Optimization for ranking higher on Google. I'd like to invite you to my upcoming free webinar on the "Top Te

Re: Proposed release goal: python 2.6 by default

2009-09-29 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
2009/9/29 Josselin Mouette : > Hi, > > there is already broad agreement that this should be the case, so I’d > like to submit Python 2.6 being the default as a release goal for > squeeze. magnificent! -- my place on the web: floss-and-misc.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-relea

Proposed release goal: python 2.6 by default

2009-09-29 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, there is already broad agreement that this should be the case, so I’d like to submit Python 2.6 being the default as a release goal for squeeze. I have written a status page as it is usually requested: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/Python2.6 Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :