Re: Boost 1.40 on debian

2009-09-10 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 07:00:55PM -0300, Lauro Moura wrote: > Hi Steve, > > I'm from the PySide project and currently we are using the 1.38 > version with some patches to boost::python, although those patches > were integrated into 1.40. Do you have any idea of when the packages > will be accepte

Bug#546055: pu: package webauth/3.6.0-1+lenny1

2009-09-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu I wasn't entirely sure what version number was supposed to go into the subject header. Hopefully it's the proposed new version. WebAuth just released a security update for a vulnerability in th

Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-10 Thread Laurent GUERBY
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 00:40 +0900, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Marc Brockschmidt [2009-08-16 14:40]: > | ada? > > According to Martin Guy, there has been some progress with Ada > upstream: http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2009/08/msg00047.html For the record Ada on armv5tel-linux with the late

Re: open issues with the hppa port

2009-09-10 Thread dann frazier
[correcting lamont's e-mail] LaMont: have you been seeing further "random segfault" bugs on peri/penalosa over the past week or two? Is this something you can monitor for us? Rest inline.. On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:10:28PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:53 PM, dann fr

Re: open issues with the hppa port

2009-09-10 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:53 PM, dann frazier wrote: > We have been running with UP kernels for quite some time, and they > haven't proven to be any more stable. Most recently I've upgraded > peri/penalosa to 2.6.31-rc6-based kernels since they were inclusive of > the various changes I was pointed

Re: [Lenny,regression] Bug#524505: qcontrol: no longer works with udev in lenny

2009-09-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > I agree that at this point an update qcontrol is the most obvious > > solution. I'll wait for confirmation from SRM before preparing an > > upload. > > Please go ahead with the qcontrol update. Thanks Adam. It turns out t

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:07:34AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: > Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with > >> their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-10 Thread Vincent Danjean
Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >> One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with >> their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something >> we'll want for squeeze, depending on the freeze date you pic