On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> if [ -e /etc/pam.d/login ]; then
> perl -pli~ -e 'm/session.*pam_selinux.so/ && s/^\#\s*//o'
> /etc/pam.d/login rm /etc/pam.d/login~
> fi
> if [ -e /etc/pam.d/ssh ]; then
> perl -pli~ -e 'm/session.*pam_selinux.so/ && do { s/^\#\s*//o;
> s/multip
Russ Allbery wrote:
> At this point, all of the Shibboleth packages are now in unstable and I
> think we're just waiting for builds before they can all be hinted in
> together. It looks like everything is at least building at this point.
>
> The affected packages are:
>
> xml-security-c/1.5.
Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Johannes Ring wrote:
>>> [ Please Cc me as I'm not subscribed to the list. ]
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> ufc needs to be rebuilt against the latest swig (1.3.39). Please binNMU it.
>> Architecture: all packages cannot be binNMUed. P
Hello Torsten,
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:34:26PM +, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi Maintainer,
>
> Version: 1.40.0-1
>
> That would be the 3rd upstream version of boost in unstable after boost1.38
> and
> boost1.39 and this needs a lot of ressources (mirror disks, network bandwidth,
> buildd a
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 22:48 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> Release managers: can I upload pyenchant 1.4.2-3+lenny1 with this patch:
>
> | --- enchant/checker/__init__.py.orig2009-09-09 22:42:20.949143895
> +0200
> | +++ enchant/checker/__init__.py 2009-09-09 22:42:35.564143851 +0200
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 01:43 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 18:43 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> >> I've prepared a fix for a buffer overflow in serveez (Bug#540657), which
[...]
> I've now uploaded the package for lenny, but I've found the
fixed 545848 1.5.3-1
thanks bts
[Tapio Lehtonen, 2009-09-09]
> from enchant.checker import SpellChecker
>
> checker = SpellChecker(u"fi_FI")
> checker.add_to_personal(u"someword")
Tapio: it's fixed in 1.5.x (currently in testing)
Please use 'checker.dict.add(u"someword")' directly for now.
Rele
Unfortunately, a combination of a libtool *.la file from Xerces-C and some
build dependency problems as a result caused the Shibboleth transition to
get entangled with the icu transition. Also, during the NEW periods,
upstream released several security advisories affecting xmltooling and
shibbolet
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 499701 release.debian.org, release-notes
Bug #499701 [release-notes] [etchnhalf releasenotes] dvgrab is broken with .24
Bug reassigned from package 'release-notes' to
'release.debian.org,release-notes'.
> user release.debian@packages
Your message dated Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:24:45 +0200
with message-id <4aa7e4dd.1040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#545855: nmu: openoffice.org-voikko/3.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #545855,
regarding nmu: openoffice.org-voikko/3.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
As usual the needed bin-NMU round for openoffice.org-voikko against
a new OOo...
nmu openoffice.org-voikko_3.1-2 . None . -m "rebuild against openoffice.org
3.1.1
dw openoffice.org-voikko_3
Le mercredi 09 septembre 2009 à 14:04 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> If not at X side, is it a possibility to either (a) add the new memory
> manager to lenny (I assume not), or (b) tell the users "you need to
> upgrade your kernel first" (and make the new X pre-depending somehow
> on the kernel
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> > > their Q4 2009 release (mea
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 14:42:52 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > >
* Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org) [090909 12:37]:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> > their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
> > we'll want for squeeze, dep
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> > their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
> > we'll want for s
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
> their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
> we'll want for squeeze, depending on the freeze date you pick).
Oh, no. Not again. It
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> * How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When
> should those happen? Can we do something to make them easier?
>
One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
their Q4 2009 release (mean
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:53:41AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> As reflected in http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3284 upstream
> has recently fixed a long standing issue in proftpd which negatively
> impacts its performances. I would be inclined to propose a PU but
> I'd like havin
19 matches
Mail list logo
