On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:31:27AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:28:56PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >* Steve McIntyre [2009-04-15 15:36:57 CEST]:
> >> We currently potentially have a window of a few hours of breakage, as
> >> the web pages that point directly to the
Your message dated Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:20:30 +0200
with message-id <4aa5872e.6080...@debian.org>
and subject line Closing dummy bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #545538,
regarding pu: package pmount/0.9.19-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
pmount is widely used on many debian systems to allow normal users
to mount removable media. However, the current version of pmount in
stable cannot work with recent kernels that have
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 21:10 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> The following packages have become uninstallable in lenny on each
> release architecture. This was detected by edos.debian.net, the
> packages were installable on Thu Sep 3 23:40:02 2009, and were
> found uninstallable on the following run o
This bug also concerns proposed-updates. -Ralf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
The following packages have become uninstallable in lenny on each
release architecture. This was detected by edos.debian.net, the
packages were installable on Thu Sep 3 23:40:02 2009, and were
found uninstallable on the following run on Sat Sep
Hi!
Sorry for the massive delay.
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 14:41:15 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> Do you have any big changes planned? How much time would they take, and
> what consequences are there for the rest of the project?
There's a thread [0] on debian-dpkg with more detailed changes of w
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:31:25AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> What I personally would like is that packages are generally uploaded
> within 24 hours after the buildd log is sent, and also they are
> generally uploaded within 3 days after the source package is uploaded
> / binNMU is requested (th
Your message dated Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:50:10 +0100
with message-id <20090907095010.gf4...@halon.org.uk>
and subject line Re: [release.debian.org] nvidia non-free drivers unusable
has caused the Debian Bug report #542697,
regarding [release.debian.org] nvidia non-free drivers unusable
to be marked as
Hi SRMs
As reflected in http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3284 upstream
has recently fixed a long standing issue in proftpd which negatively
impacts its performances. I would be inclined to propose a PU but
I'd like having an ok by SRMs before working on it...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
-
Andreas Barth (07/09/2009):
> What I personaally would like is that packages are generally
> uploaded within 24 hours after the buildd log is sent, and also they
> are generally uploaded within 3 days after the source package is
> uploaded / binNMU is requested (the second being more some "what it
Hi,
I included more than transitions to get better picture of possible impact.
The GNU/kFreeBSD porter plans
* decide version of kernel and related utilities.
It mainly depends on freeze time. Currently we use 7.2. The 8.0 should
appear in October, but dot-zero is dot-zero.
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
> Johannes Ring wrote:
>> [ Please Cc me as I'm not subscribed to the list. ]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ufc needs to be rebuilt against the latest swig (1.3.39). Please binNMU it.
>
> Architecture: all packages cannot be binNMUed. Please have the
> maintainer
13 matches
Mail list logo
