ltsp 5.1.83-1 is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the
ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by
default, and has no changes since the previous version.
it has been in unstable for 7 days without introducing new problems.
thanks!
live well,
vagrant
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:31 AM, wrote:
> are you guys going to develope a version to use at Nehalem processors???
Your question is inappropriate for the addresses you mailed. The
debian-user list might have been more appropriate:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/
In any case, it sounds lik
are you guys going to develope a version to use at Nehalem processors???
my server is Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 5570 - 2.93GHz (Nehalem) - 1
x 8MB cache w/HT
but www.softlayer.com my data center did not put debian to use it they
said that you dont support Nehalem yet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 07:18:22PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) [090830 19:13]:
> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:59:35AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > > I'm open to suggestions. Perhaps the best way forward is to
> > > re-introduce an -mt variant name
Dear release people,
> As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
> Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
> 2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be
> possible in this time frame. So, to find out
* Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) [090830 19:13]:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:59:35AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > I'm open to suggestions. Perhaps the best way forward is to
> > re-introduce an -mt variant name as a symlink to the non-mt name. If
> > that's agreeable, I'll get it done
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:59:35AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 02:04:18PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) [090830 11:09]:
>
> > > Is this change intentional, or just a bug in the 1.39 packaging?
> >
> > > Does this retain or break
Hi folks,
I apologize for the mess.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 02:04:18PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for notifying us.
>
> * Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) [090830 11:09]:
> > /usr/share/doc/libboost-program-options1.39-dev/README.Debian
> > still lists '-lboost_program_opti
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:27:46PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:07:59PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org) [090827 16:44]:
> > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:05:19PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> > > > I have uploaded ICU 4.2.1 to unstable
Hi,
thanks for notifying us.
* Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) [090830 11:09]:
> /usr/share/doc/libboost-program-options1.39-dev/README.Debian
> still lists '-lboost_program_options-mt' as the name to use,
> however.
>
> Is this change intentional, or just a bug in the 1.59 packaging?
> Does
Hi,
Boost used to contain regular library names without an -st or -mt
suffix to indicate building for single- or multi-threaded use.
Boost 1.57/58 (if not earlier) switched to only providing libraries
with an -mt suffix. This was fine, but did mean as an upstream I
was required to patch my packa
Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh writes:
> i use apt-get install php5-mysql from sid repository.But i saw package
> libmysqlclient15off doesn't exist & php5-mysql depend on it.
Yes, we know. We are currently transitioning from mysql-5.0 (with
libmysqlclient15off as client lib) to mysql-5.1 (with libmysqlclie
12 matches
Mail list logo
