please unblock libpng 1.2.39-1 pciutils 1:3.1.4-1 rdate 1:1.2-4 (udebs)

2009-08-28 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
please unblock libpng 1.2.39-1 Changes: libpng (1.2.39-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * Fix out-of-date-standards-version * Fix patch-system-but-no-source-readme please unblock pciutils 1:3.1.4-1 Changes: pciutils (1:3.1.4-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New up

Re: Status of Haskell in unstable/testing

2009-08-28 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi, Am Friday 28 August 2009 22:07:29 schrieb Florian Weimer: > * Luk Claes: > > Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Luk Claes: > >>> The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1]. > >> > >> Is ia64 a registerized build (if this GHC-ism is still relevant)? [..] > > Sorry, I tried to m

RFS: xscreensaver spu

2009-08-28 Thread Michael S Gilbert
Hello, I'm looking for a sponsor for an spu update for an xscreensaver security issue in lenny.  Debdiff is attached. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xscreensaver - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unst

Re: can we upload mod-wsgi 2.5-1~lenny1 to stable?

2009-08-28 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Adam D. Barratt, 2009-08-28] > Yes, that's fine. Please go ahead. > > (fwiw, I almost requested that you backport some of the changes on top of > 2.3 instead, but by the time I'd finished and looked at the few bits that > had ended up being left out, it didn't seem worth the effort). > > If you'

Re: can we upload mod-wsgi 2.5-1~lenny1 to stable?

2009-08-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, August 28, 2009 11:56, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > See below for upstream's response. If it's fine with you, we'll also > include this change in our upload: > > | Index: mod_wsgi.c > | === > | --- mod_wsgi.c (wersja 1351) > | ++

Re: Status of Haskell in unstable/testing

2009-08-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* Luk Claes: > Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Luk Claes: >> >>> The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1]. >> >> Is ia64 a registerized build (if this GHC-ism is still relevant)? > > You apparently did not include the footnote. Though if you want to ask > if it has a buildbot

Re: Status of Haskell in unstable/testing

2009-08-28 Thread Luk Claes
Florian Weimer wrote: > * Luk Claes: > >> The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1]. > > Is ia64 a registerized build (if this GHC-ism is still relevant)? You apparently did not include the footnote. Though if you want to ask if it has a buildbot: unfortunately not. Chee

Re: Status of Haskell in unstable/testing

2009-08-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* Luk Claes: > The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1]. Is ia64 a registerized build (if this GHC-ism is still relevant)? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: security issue in libcompress-raw-bzip2-perl (CVE-2009-1884)

2009-08-28 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:50:28 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >>Oh, and considering that CVE-2009-1391 will be fixed through > >>stable-proposed-updates, we should fix this bug through s-p-u, too. > >Dear release team, attached is the debdiff for a possible upload to > >s-p-u for libcompress-raw-bz

Re: proposed stable update for perl

2009-08-28 Thread Niko Tyni
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:14:28AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 00:12 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > perl (5.10.0-19lenny2) stable; urgency=low > > . > >* Fix a typo in the replaces/conflicts/provides: libcpan-plus-perl > > should have been libcpanplus-perl. (Closes

Re: security issue in libcompress-raw-bzip2-perl (CVE-2009-1884)

2009-08-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
gregor herrmann wrote: On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:37:30 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Oh, and considering that CVE-2009-1391 will be fixed through stable-proposed-updates, we should fix this bug through s-p-u, too. So please send your final patch to debian-release@ instead of security@ (and you need

Re: security issue in libcompress-raw-bzip2-perl (CVE-2009-1884)

2009-08-28 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:37:30 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Florian Weimer: > > * gregor herrmann: > >>> * Bas Zoetekouw: > >>> > Could you please advice whether it's ok to upload an NMU with the above > >>> > patch to stable-security? > >>> Sure. Please send the debdiff for review first. > >>

Re: Please unblock eglibc/2.9-25

2009-08-28 Thread Andreas Barth
* Aurelien Jarno (aurel...@aurel32.net) [090828 14:17]: > eglibc 2.9-25 is now in unstable for 10 days without new major bugs. It > introduces the libc6 package split into libc6 + libc-bin, and libc6-dev > into libc6-dev + libc-dev-bin in preparation for multiarch. > > Could you please unblock it?

Please unblock eglibc/2.9-25

2009-08-28 Thread Aurelien Jarno
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-05-17) eglibc 2.9-25 is now in unstable for 10 days without new major bugs. It introduces the libc6 package split into libc6 + libc-bin, and libc6-dev into libc6-dev + libc-dev-bin in preparation for multiarch. Could you please unblock it? Thanks in advance, Aurelien

Re: can we upload mod-wsgi 2.5-1~lenny1 to stable?

2009-08-28 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
See below for upstream's response. If it's fine with you, we'll also include this change in our upload: | Index: mod_wsgi.c | === | --- mod_wsgi.c (wersja 1351) | +++ mod_wsgi.c (wersja 1352) | @@ -1540,7 +1540,6 @@ | | i