On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:53PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> * Which major upstream releases of perl are expected in the next two
> years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit
> flaky?
As already mentioned, 5.12 in two years seems unlikely but there's n
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 21:28 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> ltsp 5.1.81-2 is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the
> ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by
> default, and has no changes since the previous version.
>
> it has been in unstable for
On 16.08.2009 15:15, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:06PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
* Which major upstream releases of OO.org are expected in the next two
years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit
flaky?
The next two years f
Bastian Blank a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two
>> proposals:
>> - define a new sparc64 port, and bootstrap this one using the 32bit port.
>
> This is rather easy. I already did
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:53:08AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> It's not intended that multiarch supports switching architectures.
It's also just an upgrade. Or did I miss something that would make it
impossible to replace perl/i386 with perl/amd64?
Bastian
--
Many Myths are based on truth
Daniel Burrows writes:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:08PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt
> was heard to say:
>> Heya,
>>
>> As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
>> Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
>> 2009, and some devel
On 16.08.2009 14:41, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Heya,
As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be
possible in this tim
On 16.08.2009 10:50, Luk Claes wrote:
Matthias Klose wrote:
On 29.04.2009 04:49, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Florian Weimer:
I've asked the FSF for a clarification (the second time, the first
clarification resulted in the Java bytecode exception). Until we know
for sure how to interpret the exce
Matthias Klose (20/08/2009):
> OpenJDK/IcedTea ports for the Hurd, FreeBSD and Linux/hppa are
> missing. Afaik nobody works on these.
It's on (my|the) todo list for GNU/kFreeBSD, at least. So many things
to do, so little time. :)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 16.08.2009 14:41, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Heya,
As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be
possible in this tim
On 16.08.2009 14:40, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Heya,
As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be
possible in this tim
On 19.08.2009 16:33, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two
proposal
Hi Luk,
The original source can be found here:
http://rbalint.cs.bme.hu/ws-pkg/wireshark_1.0.8.orig.tar.gz
The diffs are maintained in subversion.
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-maint/ext-maint/wireshark/tags/1.0.8-1/#_ext-maint_wireshark_tags_1.0.8-1_
I think 1.0.8-1 would be the right versi
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:45:46AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:09:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:33:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > If I understand this correctly, this would need the modification off all
> > > library packages to i
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:09:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:33:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > If I understand this correctly, this would need the modification off all
> > library packages to implement biarch semantic.
> ... which will be needed anyways. So your c
15 matches
Mail list logo
