On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:33:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>> I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how t
I have uploaded ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. Once it builds, it should be
possible to initiate rebuilds of its reverse dependencies. Thanks.
--
Jay Berkenbilt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two
>>> proposals:
>>> - have an inplace-transit
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Carlos O'Donell (car...@systemhalted.org) [090819 14:56]:
>> I didn't know vlc, xmms2, and xmp were not building. I'll add them to
>> my list and look over the failures. I don't know how to get visibility
>> into what's failing for hppa.
>
>
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Marc
Brockschmidt wrote:
> As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
> Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
> 2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be
> possible
* Carlos O'Donell (car...@systemhalted.org) [090819 14:56]:
> I didn't know vlc, xmms2, and xmp were not building. I'll add them to
> my list and look over the failures. I don't know how to get visibility
> into what's failing for hppa.
Basically, by e.g. checking the testing excuse page which pac
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> Or are you simply asking the hppa porters to be more active in filing
>> FTBFS bugs against packages after build failures?
>
> If they would do that, that might be quite helpful to distinguish
> between "hppa issue" and "package issue".
I d
On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two
proposals:
- define a new sparc64 port, and bootstrap this one using the 32bit port.
This is rather easy. I alre
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two
> proposals:
> - define a new sparc64 port, and bootstrap this one using the 32bit port.
This is rather easy. I already did a s390x bootstrap using this meth
On 18.08.2009 22:43, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hello,
I would like to point out that sparc release requalification is currently
placing it in "at risk" position for squeeze release. The most serious
problems with the port are lack of developer involvement (there is currently
one active porter/develope
Le mercredi 19 août 2009 à 00:04 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> You can add a transition which is larger than all of these together:
> libpanel-applet is planned to be ported to D-Bus instead of bonobo. I
> have no details currently since it hasn’t been implemented yet, but it
> is likely to
11 matches
Mail list logo
