Re: GNOME plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 16 août 2009 à 15:57 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > > * How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should > > those > > happen? Can we do something to make them easier? > > As for transitions per se, here are the ones already planned: > * evolution:

Re: BinNMUs for libogg.la removal

2009-08-18 Thread Christophe Mutricy
Hello, Le Thu 06 Aug 09 à 17:14 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > > Libogg-dev 1.1.4~dfsg-1 recent upload has removed /usr/lib/libogg.la. > > > > It breaks the .la which reference libogg.la. That concerns at least > > libshout, libflac, libvorbis and libtheora: > > > > so i suggest: > > binNMUs sche

Re: Linux Kernel plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-18 Thread Faidon Liambotis
maximilian attems wrote: Also, I remember reading about an effort on merging dom0 to mailine. From your experience, is there a chance of that happening for 2.6.32? >>> I don't think so. >> For the record, Xen upstream[1] mentions "dom0 support, currently >> planned for Linux 2.6.32 or 2.6

Re: Linux Kernel plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-18 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:48:57AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> Also, I remember reading about an effort on merging dom0 to mailine. > >> From your experience, is there a chance of that happening for 2.6.32? > > > > I don't think so. > For the record, Xen upstream[1]

Re: TeX Live plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-18 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining wrote: > So bottomline I see: > - Till December I am not sure we can get TL2009 into stable Let me add two things. First, I think "not sure" is a bit weak. We'd need a whole lot of luck to manage that. Remember the first mail you, Norbert, wrote when the "December freeze" was a