On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
> Like FTBFS of linux-modules-extra-2.6 on 3 architectures I guess? That
> seemed to me like a valid reason not to want to migrate .29 to testing.
Also the armel linux-2.6 FTBFS:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6;ver=2.6.30-2;arc
On Saturday 11 July 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
> > what are the remaining issues that you are concerned about?
>
> The ones that prevent linux-2.6 from migrating once it would be
> unblocked.
Like FTBFS of linux-modules-extra-2.6 on 3 architectures I guess? That
seemed to me like a valid reason not t
On sam, 2009-07-11 at 19:48 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Would it be possible to include it in spu and in the next stable
> > release?
>
> Yes, please upload.
Done, thanks!
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> xfce4-weather-plugin in stable recently stopped to work, because it uses
> weather.com XOAP without really respecting the API, and especially it
> doesn't use a key. The version in testing correctly handles that, but
> the patch is too heavy for a stable upload.
Hi,
xfce4-weather-plugin in stable recently stopped to work, because it uses
weather.com XOAP without really respecting the API, and especially it
doesn't use a key. The version in testing correctly handles that, but
the patch is too heavy for a stable upload.
An intermediate version would be to
maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting
>> it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability
>> of the kernel team...
>
> it is mostly done, beside the s
Luk Claes (11/07/2009):
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > From silc-toolkit_1.1.9-1/changelog:
> > |* libsilc and libsilcclient are now shipped in two different binary
> > packages
> > | in order to respect their SONAMEs. The -dev package depends on both
> > and
> > | has been renamed
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting
> it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability
> of the kernel team...
it is mostly done, beside the strange cpio missing build dep,
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:46:24PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Luk Claes (11/07/2009):
> > Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > > Hi mighty members of the release team,
> > >
> > > Could you please schedule a binNMU of pidgin against
> > > libsilc-dev (>= 1.1.9-1) in order to update its binary deps?
> >
>Ah, that's the reason. I thought there were different source packages
>involved (for libkrb53), but apparently you ask to do a gross hack to
>keep the libkrb53 binary package in while migrating krb5 and its
>remaining binary packages. This is possible, though I'd rather not do that.
>If we would
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Luk Claes (11/07/2009):
>> Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
>>> Hi mighty members of the release team,
>>>
>>> Could you please schedule a binNMU of pidgin against
>>> libsilc-dev (>= 1.1.9-1) in order to update its binary deps?
>> Can you please give a bit more context as it doesn't
Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Luk" == Luk Claes writes:
>
> Luk> Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>
>> Hi.
>
> Luk> Hi
>
> >> This is an update on my message about the krb5 transition.
> >>
> >> Currently, if krb5 1.7 from unstable were to migrate into
> >> testing and if the li
Matthias Klose wrote:
> please upload gcc-4.4 4.4.0-10 for mips, or start a new build if the build is
> lost (built on June 29). the eglibc migration depends on the recent gcc-4.4
> package.
Scheduled for upload.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
> > Could this be prioritized by the involved teams (mostly kernel and
> > release, I'd guess) or are there already some plans for this to
> > happen?
>
> There are no plans to force anything in like some propose in such
> situations as there is no clear plan
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2009-06-27, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>> On 2009-06-01, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2009-05-28, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> xemacs21
> All removed
Thanks.
Luk Claes (11/07/2009):
> Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > Hi mighty members of the release team,
> >
> > Could you please schedule a binNMU of pidgin against
> > libsilc-dev (>= 1.1.9-1) in order to update its binary deps?
>
> Can you please give a bit more context as it doesn't seem obvious why
> this
> "Luk" == Luk Claes writes:
Luk> Sam Hartman wrote:
>>
> Hi.
Luk> Hi
>> This is an update on my message about the krb5 transition.
>>
>> Currently, if krb5 1.7 from unstable were to migrate into
>> testing and if the libkrb53 binary package were maintained in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 15:05 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> I want to fix #536489 [i|+| ] [znc] znc: Possible crash if a user is
>> connecting to a server and will be deleted at the same time
>>
>> debdiff attached:
>>
>>
Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:19:38AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
>> Oldstable release managers: will you accept a libarchive-tar-perl
>> 1.38-3~etch2 upload with the diversions added, or can you suggest
>> another fix? What's the schedule for the Etch r9 release?
Introducing dive
Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> Hi releasers,
> I would like to ask if a fix for #524957 would be accepted in
> proposed-updates. This bug, while being trivial, makes smb
> authentication unusable in the current version of squid in lenny. The
> fix is in sid ATM and has been repeatedly tested.
Looks good
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 15:05 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> I want to fix #536489 [i|+| ] [znc] znc: Possible crash if a user is
> connecting to a server and will be deleted at the same time
>
> debdiff attached:
>
> debian/patches/03-crash-deleted-user.dpatch | 21 +
> zn
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> could you please binnmu mlt on all architectures against libsox-dev (>=
> 14.3.0)?
scheduled, btw it would be good to mention what old binary package is
replaced by which new one.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.o
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Hi mighty members of the release team,
>
> Could you please schedule a binNMU of pidgin against
> libsilc-dev (>= 1.1.9-1) in order to update its binary deps?
Can you please give a bit more context as it doesn't seem obvious why
this would be needed?
Cheers
Luk
--
To U
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 04:57:54PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Robert Millan wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:30:46PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:05:29PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> In the meantime, it's uninstallable (see #533216).
Christian Perrier wrote:
> During the last meeting of the D-I 'team' (ahem) which logs can be read
> from http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings, the situation
> of the kernel packages wrt testing transition was raised.
>
> Apparently, having a new kernel in testing (whether this is 2.6.3
Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> Hi.
Hi
> This is an update on my message about the krb5 transition.
>
> Currently, if krb5 1.7 from unstable were to migrate into testing and
> if the libkrb53 binary package were maintained in testing (it
> disappears from the krb5 source package between testing and uns
Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:08:22AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Nicolas Boullis wrote:
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 08:03:20AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
If you are sure that there are no API changes, then please upload to
unstable and tell us w
Am Dienstag, den 07.04.2009, 20:27 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> + Sebastian Dröge (Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:26:20 +0100):
>
> Hello,
>
> > > > I'll take a look at some packages in the next days and send an status
> > > > update to those bugs, maybe raising the severity to important now...
> > > Sure
28 matches
Mail list logo
