Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-05-28 Thread Barry deFreese
Adeodato Simó wrote: libjsw All removed From a very quick look, at least some remained, eg. libjsw above: trying: -gtk+1.2 skipped: -gtk+1.2 (5 <- 399) got: 16+0: i-16 * i386: epigrass, etalk, gpsim-led, gpsim-logic, gspiceui, gtalk, gtkglarea5, gtkglarea5-dev, gw

Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-05-28 Thread Barry deFreese
Adeodato Simó wrote: libjsw All removed From a very quick look, at least some remained, eg. libjsw above: trying: -gtk+1.2 skipped: -gtk+1.2 (5 <- 399) got: 16+0: i-16 * i386: epigrass, etalk, gpsim-led, gpsim-logic, gspiceui, gtalk, gtkglarea5, gtkglarea5-dev, gw

Re: [SRM] Update of gnupg/gnupg2 to fix a memory leak

2009-05-28 Thread Luk Claes
Daniel Leidert wrote: Am Sonntag, den 24.05.2009, 19:37 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes: Daniel Leidert wrote: Hi, In the past it had been reported several times, that importing a large keyring (for example the Debian keyring) might need a really long time and make gnupg allocate much memory (trying t

Re: please approve and unblock rdate 1:1.2-1 (udeb)

2009-05-28 Thread Luk Claes
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: please approve and unblock rdate 1:1.2-1 (udeb) unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: please approve and unblock libpng 1.2.36-1 (udeb)

2009-05-28 Thread Luk Claes
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: please approve and unblock libpng 1.2.36-1 (udeb) unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: please approve and unblock pciutils 1:3.1.2-4 (udeb)

2009-05-28 Thread Luk Claes
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: please approve and unblock pciutils 1:3.1.2-4 (udeb) unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: please approve and unblock xfsprogs 3.0.2 (udeb)

2009-05-28 Thread Luk Claes
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: please approve and unblock xfsprogs 3.0.2 (udeb) unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

please approve and unblock xfsprogs 3.0.2 (udeb)

2009-05-28 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
please approve and unblock xfsprogs 3.0.2 (udeb) Changes: xfsprogs (3.0.2) unstable; urgency=low . * New bugfix release -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

please approve and unblock rdate 1:1.2-1 (udeb)

2009-05-28 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
please approve and unblock rdate 1:1.2-1 (udeb) Changes: rdate (1:1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release - Don't use the deprecated sysctl system call with 1.40; closes: #483470 * Build depend on quilt * Standards Version is 3.8.1 * DH compatibility is 7

please approve and unblock pciutils 1:3.1.2-4 (udeb)

2009-05-28 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
please approve and unblock pciutils 1:3.1.2-4 (udeb) Changes: pciutils (1:3.1.2-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Update pci.ids with snapshot dated 2009-05-19 03:15:01 * Fix typo in setpci manpage; closes: #525258 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a s

please approve and unblock libpng 1.2.36-1 (udeb)

2009-05-28 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
please approve and unblock libpng 1.2.36-1 (udeb) Changes: libpng (1.2.36-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * Standards-Version is 3.8.1 * debhelper compat is 7 * Run dh_prep instead of dh_clean -k -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.or

Re: live-magic 1.5+lenny1 for stable

2009-05-28 Thread Chris Lamb
Luk Claes wrote: > > I didn't get the memo on the whole /etc/debian_version thing and > > would like to upload live-magic 1.5+lenny1 to stable. [..] > Please upload. Uploaded. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org `- signature.asc Descr

Re: Open MPI 1.3 transition

2009-05-28 Thread Manuel Prinz
Hi Release Team! Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2009, 12:43 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó: > Okay, thanks for pursuing this, let's go forward with it. Please upload > and let us know when you have done so. Done. Uploaded as 1.3.2-2, no modifications compared to 1.3.2-1 in experimental. Best regards Manuel

Re: (partial) ghc6 6.10.3 library transition

2009-05-28 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:55:45PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > I think the following packages by Marco have been missed by kaol, can > you please schedule them as well? > > nmu haskell-zlib-0.5.0.0-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against GHC 6.10.3' ^ Actually those are separated wit

Re: (partial) ghc6 6.10.3 library transition

2009-05-28 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi RM, Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2009, 14:28 +0300 schrieb Kari Pahula: > I've just uploaded a new ghc6 version to unstable. All Haskell > libraries will need to be rebuilt against it. The following Haskell > libraries were built successfully against 6.10.1, so I'm fairly > certain that they should

Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-05-28 Thread Adeodato Simó
> > libjsw > All removed From a very quick look, at least some remained, eg. libjsw above: trying: -gtk+1.2 skipped: -gtk+1.2 (5 <- 399) got: 16+0: i-16 * i386: epigrass, etalk, gpsim-led, gpsim-logic, gspiceui, gtalk, gtkglarea5, gtkglarea5-dev, gwave, jscalibrator, libguilegtk-

Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2

2009-05-28 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > icewm > linpopup > wmclockmon > cheops > codebreaker > gaby > dbmix > gcrontab > gbuffy > gcvs > gcx > geg > gman > gps > gqcam > gtkpool > libjsw > i2e > mah-jong > mbrowse > predict > xemacs21 > swami > xoscope > xscorch > Al

Re: Please hint some shorewall* packages

2009-05-28 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 07:46:40PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > It apears that the following shorewall* packages require manual hinting: > > shorewall-common > shorewall-perl > shorewall-shell > shorewall6 > > Please allow them to propogate to testing. Hinted, thanks. Kind regards, Philip