Re: hppa in danger of being ignored for testing migration and

2009-04-28 Thread John David Anglin
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:34 PM, dann frazier wrote: > Yes the supplementary buildd had a major hardware failure today > (SBA/LBA failures during last POST and now the GSP can't load PDC > anymore. The machine is basically dead). I'm switching the hard drives > to another box I have that I use

Re: hppa in danger of being ignored for testing migration and eventual removal

2009-04-28 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 07:31:46PM -0400, Brian Szymanski wrote: > Luk Claes wrote: >> Hi, >> >> HPPA is clearly the worst at keeping up among the release >> architectures[0], especially considering that mipsel has some temporary >> issues that are being worked on. This is causing large problems wi

Re: hppa in danger of being ignored for testing migration and eventual removal

2009-04-28 Thread Brian Szymanski
Luk Claes wrote: Hi, HPPA is clearly the worst at keeping up among the release architectures[0], especially considering that mipsel has some temporary issues that are being worked on. This is causing large problems with migrations. ... [0] https://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week-big.png

Re: hppa in danger of being ignored for testing migration and eventual removal

2009-04-28 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:57:28AM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:34 PM, dann frazier wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:09:25PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Luk Claes wrote: > > >> > * The machines that host the buildds still

Re: hppa in danger of being ignored for testing migration and eventual removal

2009-04-28 Thread Thibaut VARENE
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:34 PM, dann frazier wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:09:25PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Luk Claes wrote: >> > * The machines that host the buildds still seem to have a very >> > unreliable kernel. Is there any update on this? >

Re: hppa in danger of being ignored for testing migration and eventual removal

2009-04-28 Thread Matthias Klose
dann frazier schrieb: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:09:25PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Luk Claes wrote: >>> * Has progress been made regarding proper java support? >> What is considered proper java support? GCJ? >> >> Dave, have you tinkered with GCJ lately?

Re: hppa in danger of being ignored for testing migration and eventual removal

2009-04-28 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:09:25PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Luk Claes wrote: > > * What is the status of the different porting efforts? > > Is there a list of different porting efforts? > > > * Has progress been made regarding the thread library migration?

Re: hppa in danger of being ignored for testing migration and eventual removal

2009-04-28 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Luk Claes wrote: > * What is the status of the different porting efforts? Is there a list of different porting efforts? > * Has progress been made regarding the thread library migration? The thread library migration code is complete, and passes the testsuite wit

Re: [pkg-boost-devel] Upload of Boost 1.38

2009-04-28 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Steve M. Robbins (Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:29:04 -0500): > Hello release team, Hello, > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 09:13:34PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote: > > Once boost1.38 is built in all architectures and migrated to > > testing, we can proceed with the boost-defaults plans, see below > > about th

Re: Webkit build issues

2009-04-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:45:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > I'm told Mike was looking into this, but it indeed looks like circular > Build-Dependencies... The possible long-term solution is to split libJavaScriptCore out of libwebkit, but I don't see that happening in the very near future, a

Re: Webkit build issues

2009-04-28 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:45:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > Anyway, the exact list of Bin-NMUs is rather uninteresting. More > interesting can be, I think, the current list of known transitions > against which the Release Team works, which you were pointed at on > IRC later: > > https://b

hppa in danger of being ignored for testing migration and eventual removal

2009-04-28 Thread Luk Claes
Hi, There appeared to be some porting progress right after the release, but that seems to have stalled. The port is having trouble keeping up with building and has some major flaws. HPPA is clearly the worst at keeping up among the release architectures[0], especially considering that mipsel has

Re: Webkit build issues

2009-04-28 Thread Adeodato Simó
(Bcc: -devel) + Cyril Brulebois (Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:09:53 +0200): > Heya folks, > after Ari asked on #dd, I was wondering where one can track the > currently planned binNMUs, so that I could answer his “when will webkit > stuff be rebuilt?” question. Is vorlon's page on ftp-master still the > r

Re: Webkit build issues

2009-04-28 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (28/04/2009): > after Ari asked on #dd, I was wondering where one can track the > currently planned binNMUs, so that I could answer his “when will > webkit stuff be rebuilt?” question. Is vorlon's page on ftp-master > still the reference? (Old link I have in my bookmarks, but I bet

Webkit build issues

2009-04-28 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Heya folks, after Ari asked on #dd, I was wondering where one can track the currently planned binNMUs, so that I could answer his “when will webkit stuff be rebuilt?” question. Is vorlon's page on ftp-master still the reference? (Old link I have in my bookmarks, but I bet it'd rather be somewhere

Re: Testing-watch bounces

2009-04-28 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Henning Makholm (Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:32:54 +0200): > However, I notice that bounces for undeliverable notification emails > from the system still go to my private mail server. This is not a big > deal -- I'm just procmailing them into oblivion -- but I'd like it to > stop nontheless, for the sak

Re: please unblock emdebian-archive-keyring 2.0.0

2009-04-28 Thread Luk Claes
Neil Williams wrote: > The source packages are now split and the final versions are now in > Debian unstable. > > emdebian-archive-keyring is not expected to need an update again before > Squeeze, so could 2.0.0 be unblocked please? unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rel

Re: Please unblock gtk+2.0

2009-04-28 Thread Luk Claes
Josselin Mouette wrote: > Hi, > > please let gtk+ 2.16 go into testing. It is blocking, among other > things, the gnome-desktop transition. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li

RM: toolame -- RoM: obsolete, superseded by twolame

2009-04-28 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Package: ftp.debian.org As discussed before [1], I would like to request removal of the toolame package from unstable and testing, now that the fixed version 02l-6lenny1 has entered the stable point release. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/03/msg00168.html Cheers, Fabian --

unsubcribe

2009-04-28 Thread Joshua Doyle
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

please unblock emdebian-archive-keyring 2.0.0

2009-04-28 Thread Neil Williams
The source packages are now split and the final versions are now in Debian unstable. emdebian-archive-keyring is not expected to need an update again before Squeeze, so could 2.0.0 be unblocked please? Thanks. -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.linux.codehe

Please unblock gtk+2.0

2009-04-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, please let gtk+ 2.16 go into testing. It is blocking, among other things, the gnome-desktop transition. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Descripti

Re: rebuilds of libalien-wxwidgets-perl/0.42-1

2009-04-28 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Niko Tyni, Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:58:37AM +0300 |=- > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:25:13PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > -=| Philipp Kern, Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:52:13PM +0200 |=- > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:16:17PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:13:59PM +0300