Re: Libass transition

Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:16 +0100 schrieb Christophe Mutricy: > Hi, > > Can I upload libass 0.9.6 in unstable. It has a SO version with these > reverse dependency: > > vlc > gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad > > > Hmm, now i 've just read your mail on d-d-a and both package are > affected. So I

Re: Fixed gtick in s-p-u

Hallo Rafael, am Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:38:04PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > * Philipp Kern [2009-03-25 16:15]: > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:11:17PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > > The RC Bug#514655 against gtick is damn easy to fix for lenny. Should a > > > fixed package be

Libass transition

Hi, Can I upload libass 0.9.6 in unstable. It has a SO version with these reverse dependency: vlc gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad Hmm, now i 've just read your mail on d-d-a and both package are affected. So I guess I should wait for the ffmpeg+libraw1394 transition to happen. Regards -- Xtophe

Re: Fixed gtick in s-p-u

* Philipp Kern [2009-03-25 16:15]: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:11:17PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > The RC Bug#514655 against gtick is damn easy to fix for lenny. Should a > > fixed package be uploaded to stable-proposed-updates? > > With the plain obvious fix being a dep on oss-compat

Re: Possible liblapack transition

* Rafael Laboissiere [Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:41:54 +0100]: > * Rafael Laboissiere [2009-03-09 16:49]: > > If no objections are raised in a reasonable amount of time from now, I will > > release liblapack3gf_3.2.0 to unstable without bumping the SONAME. I’m sorry this went unanswered. What you did

Re: Bug#520713: init script start hangs (request for stable update)

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:52:47AM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:49:10PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 05:34:24PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > Following finding the cause of this failure, I'd like to propose > > > the following patch (attached)

Re: Give back rhythmbox

Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > I think you need this: > > gb rhythmbox_0.11.6-1.1 . sparc > > The autobuild failed [1] against ucf 3.0017 due to a bug that is fixed in > the next version of the package: forced give-back. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debia

Re: give-back blender on mipsel

Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adeodato Simó (13/03/2009): >> * Julien BLACHE [Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:47:01 +0100]: >>> Let's hope that will happen. Does it need to get rescheduled once >>> again? >> Yes, it’s rescheduled now. We’ll see what happens. > > Worked fine. Please could you also give back blende

Re: Fixed gtick in s-p-u

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:11:17PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > The RC Bug#514655 against gtick is damn easy to fix for lenny. Should a > fixed package be uploaded to stable-proposed-updates? With the plain obvious fix being a dep on oss-compat? Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Phili

Fixed gtick in s-p-u

The RC Bug#514655 against gtick is damn easy to fix for lenny. Should a fixed package be uploaded to stable-proposed-updates? -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Give back rhythmbox

I think you need this: gb rhythmbox_0.11.6-1.1 . sparc The autobuild failed [1] against ucf 3.0017 due to a bug that is fixed in the next version of the package: ucf (3.0018) unstable; urgency=low [...] Bug fix: "Need exactly two arguments, got 3", thanks to Kurt Roeckx

give-back blender on mipsel (was: give-back for mt-daapd on mipsel)

Adeodato Simó (13/03/2009): > * Julien BLACHE [Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:47:01 +0100]: > > Let's hope that will happen. Does it need to get rescheduled once > > again? > > Yes, it’s rescheduled now. We’ll see what happens. Worked fine. Please could you also give back blender, which hit the same bug (f

preapproval for asciidoc 8.2.7-3~lenny+1

Hi, would you accept an upload of asciidoc to s-pu-u, fixing one serious and two important bugs: asciidoc (8.2.7-3) unstable; urgency=low * Replace fop with dblatex (Closes: #452470) * Install dblatex supportfiles (Closes: #494531, #496987) -- Alexander Wirt Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:27:10

Re: #520646: binNMU oprofile

Hello, > Looks like oprofile needs a rebuild . > $ opreport > opreport: error while loading shared libraries: libbfd-2.18.0.20080103.so: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > $ dpkg -L binutils | grep libbfd- > /usr/lib/libbfd-2.19.1.so I’m told libbfd.so is a private

Re: transition plan from libcap to libcap2

* Torsten Werner [Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:36:37 +0100]: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > Thoughts? At any rate, whenever a libcap-dev 2.16-3 or higher hits > > unstable, please let us know and we’ll schedule the required Bin-NMUs. > I have uploaded a new version of libcap2

Re: Bug#520713: init script start hangs (request for stable update)

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:49:10PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 05:34:24PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > Following finding the cause of this failure, I'd like to propose > > the following patch (attached) to correct it. This is also in > > git; the last five commits on the

Re: Please unblock emdebian-tools

On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:13:20 -0300 Otavio Salvador wrote: > Luk Claes writes: > > > Neil Williams wrote: > >> Could emdebian-tools be unblocked please so that 1.6.0 can migrate into > >> testing in a few days time? > > > > unblocked > > > >> (Is there a different way to do this - iirc it is onl