Hi Dato,
On Saturday 07 March 2009 21:01:00 Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * in the first place, regarding liblinphone3 and libortp8, only
> linphone depends on them in testing (and are in fact provided by the
> same linphone source package), so any time you want to do this
> transition is f
Hi,
it looks like metacity took much less time to get out of NEW than what I
expected. I hope it doesn’t stomp on other transitions.
The following packages need to be rebuilt:
nmu compiz_0.7.6-7 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against
libmetacity-private0'
dw compiz_0.7.6-7 . ALL . -m
I have uploaded ICU 4.0.1-1 to unstable, as I mentioned I intended to
do in a previous message. This version is supposed to be fully
source-compatible, and I have not changed the name of the -dev
package, so it should be sufficient to just queue rebuilds of all
dependent packages. As far as I ca
> I've gone ahead and scheduled a Bin-NMU for libccscript3
Thanks dato,
Sorry I had missed that one.
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Am Saturday 07 March 2009 20:16:37 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
[..]
>
> If somebody could work with Barry to see if the SONAME given by upstream
> for 1.1.1 is appropriate, that'd be great too. Barry, a good start would
> be the output of `nm -D` and `objdump -p` for the 1.1.1 library, plus
> the c
* Adeodato Simó [2009-03-07 20:29]:
> * Rafael Laboissiere [Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:38:01 +0100]:
>
> > #516559 audacious-plugins: FTBFS against libmtp-dev 0.3.6 now in unstable
> > #516563 gnomad2: FTBFS against libmtp-dev 0.3.6 now in unstable
> > #516564 rhythmbox: FTBFS against libmtp-dev 0.3.6
Hi,
7 березня 2009 о 13:35 +1100 Mark Purcell написав(-ла):
> Could be large rdepends;
>
> libexiv2-4
> Reverse Depends:
> gpscorrelate-gui
> gpscorrelate
These two build and work fine with libexiv2 from experimental.
Regards,
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 18:21 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 07:55:33PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I'd like to propose a stable update for devscripts to add a few small
> > changes which will make things easier for maintainers during the squeeze
> > release cycle. Specif
* Rafael Laboissiere [Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:38:01 +0100]:
Hello,
> #516559 audacious-plugins: FTBFS against libmtp-dev 0.3.6 now in unstable
> #516563 gnomad2: FTBFS against libmtp-dev 0.3.6 now in unstable
> #516564 rhythmbox: FTBFS against libmtp-dev 0.3.6 now in unstable
It's been two weeks now
* Adeodato Simó [Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:36:53 +0100]:
> There is also twinkle, which I see you very recently uploaded, but there
> is also libccscript3; what about that package? I see it has no version
> in experimental: is a sourceful upload planned, or does it need Bin-NMUs
> as well?
I've gone ah
--- libphysfs-1.0.1.orig/configure
+++ libphysfs-1.0.1/configure
@@ -1506,8 +1506,8 @@
MAJOR_VERSION=1
MINOR_VERSION=0
MICRO_VERSION=1
-INTERFACE_AGE=0
-BINARY_AGE=0
+INTERFACE_AGE=1
+BINARY_AGE=1
VERSION=$MAJOR_VERSION.$MINOR_VERSION.$MICRO_VERSION
--- libphysfs-1.0.1-2.orig/configure.in
+
* Barry deFreese [Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:13:40 -0500]:
Hello,
Second, and more importantly, I actually see no reason for the SONAME
bump! Meaning, that as far as I can see, the list of symbols between
libphysfs-1.0.so.1 and libphysfs-1.0.so.0 is identical. Do you know if
there ha
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 07:55:33PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I'd like to propose a stable update for devscripts to add a few small
> changes which will make things easier for maintainers during the squeeze
> release cycle. Specifically, the changes are:
>
> * bts: Recognise the "squeeze" an
On sam, 2009-03-07 at 16:05 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Scheduled.
Thanks!
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
* Yves-Alexis Perez [Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:33:17 +0100]:
> Hhmh, due to my local pbuilder having 4.6 Xfce libs, I've uploaded two
> packages with dependencies from 4.6 in experimental instead of 4.4 in
> unstable. Could you please schedule binNMUs on amd64 for:
> xfce4-places-plugin 1.1.0-3
> xfce
Hello debian-release team,
debian-volatile team,
debian-security team,
I have updated bug report 457291 "flashplugin-nonfree: decision
2007-12-21: keep this package out of stable starting with lenny".
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=457291
I hereby invite you to evalu
Hhmh, due to my local pbuilder having 4.6 Xfce libs, I've uploaded two
packages with dependencies from 4.6 in experimental instead of 4.4 in
unstable. Could you please schedule binNMUs on amd64 for:
xfce4-places-plugin 1.1.0-3
xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin 0.4.2-2
Thanks!
--
Yves-Alexis
signatur
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:30:22 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 13:35:29 +1100, Mark Purcell wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hello Mark,
>
> > I propose a transition with libexiv2-5 (already in experimental) source
> > package exiv2. Which is a new upstream release from unstable.
> >
> > Co
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 13:35:29 +1100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Hi,
Hello Mark,
> I propose a transition with libexiv2-5 (already in experimental) source
> package exiv2. Which is a new upstream release from unstable.
>
> Could be large rdepends;
>
> libexiv2-4
> Reverse Depends:
> [..]
> gthumb
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:18:50 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * David Paleino [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:52:02 +0100]:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:31:07 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:35:08 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
>
> > > > Hello Luk,
>
> > > > I suggest that David follow
Hey,
xfce4-dict in Lenny have a problem, where the processes it runs become
zombies in the end. This is fixed in 0.5.1, but stable has 0.4.0, so
upgrade wasn't really possible. But the patch is a one liner, so it was
easy to backport it to 0.4.0, and thus I'd like to ask for a SPU upload
if possib
* David Paleino [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:52:02 +0100]:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:31:07 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:35:08 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> > > Hello Luk,
> > > I suggest that David follows this approach for getting the critical bug
> > > fixed in stable :
> > >
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:53:30 -0300]:
Hi again,
> Personally I belive that, after a small period of fixing, those scripts
> should ramain mostly unmodified for long time. I don't think we'd need
> to be able to push changes "for next run".
> Most of things will appear as soon as w
* Mark Purcell [Sat, 07 Mar 2009 12:18:01 +1100]:
> On Friday 27 February 2009 15:38:20 Mark Purcell wrote:
> [...]
> > Awaiting endorsement from debian-release.
> Any news?
Hello, sorry for the delay, we're a bit overloaded. Let's see:
* in the first place, regarding liblinphone3 and libortp
* Mark Purcell [Sat, 07 Mar 2009 12:33:26 +1100]:
> On Wednesday 18 February 2009 12:56:46 Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > If some packages don't need sourceful uploads, please let us know and
> > we'll schedule binNMUs
> Dato,
> I think we only need two binNMU's which we are ready for now:
> glcpu &
* Torsten Marek [Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:54:46 +0100]:
> Hi all,
> I'd like to upload QScintilla 2.3.2 to unstable, which will contain the
> following change:
> * libqscintilla2-3 -> libqscintilla2-5
> There are only two reverse dependencies (kscope, universalindentgui), so
> it's a tiny transition
Hi
Dne Sat, 7 Mar 2009 13:35:29 +1100
Mark Purcell napsal(a):
> I propose a transition with libexiv2-5 (already in experimental) source
> package exiv2. Which is a new upstream release from unstable.
pyexiv2 upstream is definitely not yet ready to move to new exiv2,
but I don't think it makes
Hi
Dne Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:14:08 +1100
Mark Purcell napsal(a):
> On Saturday 07 March 2009 13:35:29 Mark Purcell wrote:
> > I propose a transition with libexiv2-5 (already in experimental) source
> > package exiv2. Which is a new upstream release from unstable.
>
> Also could I ask the rdepends
28 matches
Mail list logo
