On Saturday 07 March 2009 16:29:55 Yasuhiro Araki wrote:
> Hello Mark,
Hi!
> I am afraid I had not updated information about libosip2.
No problem, just wanting to ping the issue along.
> Actually, renewing libosip2 package does not difficult.
> I have concern about side effect for some packages
Hello Mark,
I am afraid I had not updated information about libosip2.
Actually, renewing libosip2 package does not difficult.
I have concern about side effect for some packages which depend
libosip2. And I cannot check whole packages.
Maybe, now is a good oppotunity to renew libosip2. Because of
On Saturday 07 March 2009 13:35:29 Mark Purcell wrote:
> I propose a transition with libexiv2-5 (already in experimental) source
> package exiv2. Which is a new upstream release from unstable.
Also could I ask the rdepends (Cc:) to try the package in experimental and
report back (to debian-releas
Hi,
I propose a transition with libexiv2-5 (already in experimental) source
package exiv2. Which is a new upstream release from unstable.
Could be large rdepends;
libexiv2-4
Reverse Depends:
krita
libstreamanalyzer0
libkexiv2-7
libkexiv2-6
libkexiv2-5
kphotoalbum
ufraw
qtpfsgui
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 12:56:46 Adeodato Simó wrote:
> If some packages don't need sourceful uploads, please let us know and
> we'll schedule binNMUs
Dato,
I think we only need two binNMU's which we are ready for now:
glcpu & bayonne:
nmu glcpu 1.0.1-6.3 . ALL . -m 'binNMU: libcommoncpp2
On Friday 27 February 2009 15:38:20 Mark Purcell wrote:
[...]
> Awaiting endorsement from debian-release.
Any news?
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Neil Williams wrote:
> emdebian-tools appears to still be frozen - could it be unblocked
> please so that 1.5.0 can migrate into testing?
unblocked
cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Luk Claes writes:
>
>> Michael Schutte wrote:
>>> Hi -release,
>>>
>>> Please let kbd 1.15-1 (which builds kbd-udeb) migrate to testing.
>> Cc-ing d-i list to see if it's ok to unblock it now.
>
> [...]
>
> Ack
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luk Claes writes:
> Michael Schutte wrote:
>> Hi -release,
>>
>> Please let kbd 1.15-1 (which builds kbd-udeb) migrate to testing.
>
> Cc-ing d-i list to see if it's ok to unblock it now.
[...]
Ack
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
Hi,
I'd like to propose a stable update for devscripts to add a few small
changes which will make things easier for maintainers during the squeeze
release cycle. Specifically, the changes are:
* bts: Recognise the "squeeze" and "squeeze-ignore" tags.
* debchange:
+ Modify --bpo to produce a ch
emdebian-tools appears to still be frozen - could it be unblocked
please so that 1.5.0 can migrate into testing?
Thanks.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpUekqFNzkRf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
11 matches
Mail list logo
