Hi Release Team,
Due to trademark violation, keyjnote was removed from lenny a bit more
than a week ago. Meanwhile I have uploaded the same version of a new
brand of the project: impressive.
It has been in unstable for 13 days, functionally it is 100% equivalent to the
last release of keyjnote wh
Dear Release Team,
I have just uploaded a fix for an RC bug (#494760). It is a new
upstream release (even when the package is "native"), but the changes
are pretty contained. You can see the full diff in the bug report.
Please allow it to migrate to testing.
Thanks, Tincho.
-- Forwarded
Hi,
so here is an update on the djvulibre-plugin segfault.
Using only the upstream patch, the segfault remained for me, the plugin
segfaulting at the first line changed in the patch. There seems to be
some race condition: sprinkling a few fprintf's for debugging makes the
segfault go away, as does
I've NMUed a fix for this RC bug.
I don't know if I need to send mail here or if you would notice
automagically for an RC bug, but sending mail cannot hurt.
--- Begin Message ---
Your message dated Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:17:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#476525: fixed in libhid 0.
* Sandro Tosi [Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:45:07 +0100]:
> Hello,
> the version in subject has a debconf translation and some minor
> packaging fixes: I'd kindly ask you to unblock it.
Unblocked.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said:
> ===
> --- debian/README.Debian(revision 676)
> +++ debian/README.Debian(working copy)
> @@ -62,6 +62,13 @@
>/etc/hdparm.conf, that will fail the first time (as the d
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>> This version fixes a bug in the avision backend and adds a new debconf
>>> translation. Please unblock, changelog below.
>> unblocked
>
> It looks like the armel buildds haven't picked up that version yet, as
> I see no build and no build lo
Luk Claes wrote:
Hi,
>> This version fixes a bug in the avision backend and adds a new debconf
>> translation. Please unblock, changelog below.
>
> unblocked
It looks like the armel buildds haven't picked up that version yet, as
I see no build and no build log for armel. Can someone check & req
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:29:25PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Please hint it (3.1-2) into Testing.
>
> Unblocked.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Patrick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> We are going to introduce a package that ships a "lsb_release" file, and
> we're going to handle it via the proposed- suites. Hopefully
> lsb-release (the program) will move to using that file, but I'm know
> thinking it could be reasonable to move debia
And another ...
The following happened from .dfsg.11 to .dfsg.12:
blacklist=removed from distribution (.orig.tar and bin debs) umrand
which is nonfree (closes RC #508890). Furthermore a ${misc:Depends} has
been added to the depends to make lintian happy.
Please unblock. Thanks.
Best wishes
Nor
Hello,
the version in subject has a debconf translation and some minor
packaging fixes: I'd kindly ask you to unblock it.
Cheers,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Hi,
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> I talked with Rene, and we (sort of) agreed you should not worry about
> this for Lenny. It is unfortunate that the way base-files is handled
FTR, I never disputed that. But it should be fixed for sid as soon
as base-files 5 migrated at least by reintroducing "testing/u
13 matches
Mail list logo
