Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> From quite far, this makes a lot of changes and, would I be in the
.../...
To make it clearer, this opinion is not, in any way, meant to be the
D-I team's opinion.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > From quite far, this makes a lot of changes and, would I be in the
> > release team, I would feel quite uncomfortable allowing such changes
> > to go in testing when seeing how they can hardly break systems. The
> > "it breaks to much" comment is inde
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:36:11PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>> (Also, FYI, there will be a bit period of time where
>> apache2-mpm-itk will be uninstallable in testing, the time between
>> apache2 entering testing and the buildds binNMUing it against
>> testing.)
> CCing Steinar for this info.
Dear release team,
bug #507003 is about a conffile in /etc that says "DO NOT EDIT OR REMOVE
THIS FILE" and should better reside in /var. It has correctly been
tagged as serious by Steve Langasek as this is against the policy (see
bug report for more details).
The recent past has shown that even
Hi Adeodato,
On Saturday 29 November 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Ok, done. unstable has +b3 at the moment, I've scheduled +b5 to
> leave +b4 free for use in testing, should we need it.
Thanks.
> > And a related question: Since 2.2.9-11 is blocked from migration
> > by libpcre3, would you accept
Hi. Bill and I believe the popcon package in unstable should migrate
into testing. It is mostly a i18n update, with a few minor updates to
make the server part more up-to-date and avoid a edge case problem.
This is the changelog:
popularity-contest (1.46) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Petter
#include
* Marc Haber [Tue, Dec 02 2008, 01:15:15PM]:
> > Okay, simple question: how many RC bugs do you need to allow the push of
> > the Unstable version at the moment? I have one RC candidate (#506273),
>
> I am sure that a minimal patch against the version currently in lenny,
Wow, so sure.
Hello, Nelson. #507269 has been recently brought to our attention, and
I'd like to pop in because, unlike what you state in the bug report,
this issue affects Debian, so it should be addressed if possible,
independently of whether that benefits Ubuntu or not. Let's see if we
can agree on something.
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 16:49 +, Martin Meredith wrote:
> Hey there.
>
> I've just recieved a bug from a user regarding the fact that the Symfony
> package in testing can't be used for anything other than maintaining a
> current codebase that uses symfony. It can't currently create a new
> proje
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:17:43AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> So, -4 was triggering some RC bugs, such as #506536 and #506534. This
> is fixed in -6
This happens for not-announced relations.
> From quite far, this makes a lot of changes and, would I be in the
> release team, I would feel q
Hey there.
I've just recieved a bug from a user regarding the fact that the Symfony
package in testing can't be used for anything other than maintaining a
current codebase that uses symfony. It can't currently create a new
project, which I believe that people should be able to.
I added this funct
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 01:17:34PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Well, ideally, I would not need to use MToolkit, which would make
> this bug something I couldn't care less about. But since XToolkit is
> broken wrt ICCCM, I have to.
or, you could use one of the workarounds mentioned.
> So this
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:22:18AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Okay, simple question: how many RC bugs do you need to allow the push of
> the Unstable version at the moment? I have one RC candidate (#506273),
I am sure that a minimal patch against the version currently in lenny,
fixing the RC bug
Alexander Wirt schrieb am Friday, den 28. November 2008:
Hi,
> unfortunatly Nagios has some security bug which can lead to remote command
> execution under some very special circumstances. See [1] for more details.
> Upstream released 3.0.5 which addresses this issue and is fixes are very
> int
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 02:30:51AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Bastian Blank [Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:39:45 +0100]:
> > Please unblock linux-modules-extra-2.6/2.6.26-5. It is a schedules
> > rebuild to introduce new images and build against new modules sources.
> I already unblocked it on 2008-11-1
15 matches
Mail list logo
