libselinux-2.0.65-4

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493316 Please allow libselinux-2.0.65-4 (which I have just uploaded to unstable) into Lenny to close the above bug. There is a one-line change which is what Josselin suggested in a response to the bug. This is necessary for operation of the audi

please unblock opensc

Hi The opensc package in sid fixes CVE-2008-2235[0] and the changes are trivial (security fix, typo fix, standards version change). Please unblock it so it can go straight into lenny. Cheers Steffen [0]: http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-2235 signature.asc Description: This

please unblock httrack

Hi Could you please unblock this package, it fixes a security issue[0]. The unstable version is a new upstream version, but the changes are trivial. It includes the security patch and some changes to .desktop file and so on. I think it should migrate now, instead of going through testing-security

heimdal

Hello, Heimdal in unstable (1.2.dfsg.1-2) needs to get pushed through to testing/lenny. The testing version 1.1-3: * contains non-free RFC documents (no bug report opened). * supposedly solved version symbols (#453241 ) on AMD64, unfortunately it

Re: Please allow sphinx 0.4.2-1 into testing

Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes: > Piotr "=?utf-8?Q?O=C5=BCarowski?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I agree with Mikhail that all changes from 0.4.2 should appear in Lenny. > > I'm attaching complete debdiff and a debdiff without documentation/tests > > changes - the second one is not really that b

Re: openal-soft hppa giveback

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:33:34PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Domenico Andreoli [Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:35:57 +0200]: > > > > gb openal-soft_1:1.4.272-1 . hppa > > just built and uploaded > > Sorry to have forgot about your last message to me... > > Err, please don't upload hand-build packages

Re: Request for a exception for swfdec0.6

Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: > Hi! > > On tuesday after the freeze a bugfix version of swfdec0.6 was released, I > uploaded it to unstable (priority=high, sorry about that, I hadn't read the > freeze announcement). > > The new version is just a bugfix version and fixes several crashes, playing

Please allow xmms2tray back into Lenny

I've just had an NMU to fix #479024 uploaded to Sid: package contains compiled python code http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479024 That was the only RC bug open on the package. Scott K signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Please allow sphinx 0.4.2-1 into testing

* Piotr Ożarowski [Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:33:44 +0200]: Hello, > [no sarcasm, just a question] > Is it a general rule? The "no new upstream release" one?. I plan to upload > sqlalchemy 0.4.7p1-1 with 3 lines of code changed soon[1]. Do I really > have to prepare 0.4.7-2 with changes moved from upst

Re: unblocking partman-multipath

Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mini transition of what? libparted1.8-9 -> libparted1.8-10? Since the > 1.8 transition itself hasn't happened yet (any news about that, > Otavio?), I guess we could squeeze it in, but... please assess: is the > patch safe at this stage for the installer?

Re: Allow debian-edu-install to propagate to testing

[Pierre Habouzit] > unblocked Great. I am not sure it was enough. The message now reads: 5 days old (needed 5 days) Not touching package, as requested by freeze (contact debian-release if update is needed) Not considered Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Re: How should I handle the sitation with releaseforge?

* Roberto C. Sánchez [Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:40:46 -0400]: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:36:49PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Roberto C. Sánchez [Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:41:01 -0400]: > > > what is the procedure to have it removed? File an > > > RC bug against the package? > > For removals from te

Re: How should I handle the sitation with releaseforge?

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:36:49PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Roberto C. Sánchez [Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:41:01 -0400]: > > > what is the procedure to have it removed? File an > > RC bug against the package? > > For removals from testing only, yes, plus a message to -release asking > for a remo

Re: freeze exception for compiz

* Julien Cristau [Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:02:28 +0200]: > Hi, > the compiz packages had a broken dependency on libdecoration0, which > would break partial upgrades with compiz from bpo. I thought I fixed > this in 0.7.6-4 (uploaded before the freeze), but it turns out I didn't… > 0.7.6-5 should be g

Re: How should I handle the sitation with releaseforge?

* Roberto C. Sánchez [Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:41:01 -0400]: > what is the procedure to have it removed? File an > RC bug against the package? For removals from testing only, yes, plus a message to -release asking for a removal, with a mention of the bug number. -- Adeodato Simó

Re: Please allow sphinx 0.4.2-1 into testing

[Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2008-08-01] > Piotr "=?utf-8?Q?O=C5=BCarowski?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I agree with Mikhail that all changes from 0.4.2 should appear in Lenny. > > I'm attaching complete debdiff and a debdiff without documentation/tests > > changes - the second one is not really

Re: openal-soft hppa giveback

* Domenico Andreoli [Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:35:57 +0200]: > > gb openal-soft_1:1.4.272-1 . hppa > just built and uploaded > Sorry to have forgot about your last message to me... Err, please don't upload hand-build packages if possible! It would have most likely succeeded on the buildd as well, but i

Re: unblocking partman-multipath

* Otavio Salvador [Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:58:19 -0300]: > Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I've ported the necessary patches from 1.9 + the Debian specific parts > > over to Debian's 1.8: > > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/agx/parted1.8.git;a=summary > Patch looks OK. It is not invassi

freeze exception for compiz

Hi, the compiz packages had a broken dependency on libdecoration0, which would break partial upgrades with compiz from bpo. I thought I fixed this in 0.7.6-4 (uploaded before the freeze), but it turns out I didn't… 0.7.6-5 should be good to go; diff from 0.7.6-4 is at [0], debdiff from the curren

Request for a exception for swfdec0.6

Hi! On tuesday after the freeze a bugfix version of swfdec0.6 was released, I uploaded it to unstable (priority=high, sorry about that, I hadn't read the freeze announcement). The new version is just a bugfix version and fixes several crashes, playing content which could be remote content, thus I

Re: Please allow sphinx 0.4.2-1 into testing

Piotr "=?utf-8?Q?O=C5=BCarowski?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I agree with Mikhail that all changes from 0.4.2 should appear in Lenny. > I'm attaching complete debdiff and a debdiff without documentation/tests > changes - the second one is not really that big and changes looks sane > to me. God

Re: Please allow sphinx 0.4.2-1 into testing

I agree with Mikhail that all changes from 0.4.2 should appear in Lenny. I'm attaching complete debdiff and a debdiff without documentation/tests changes - the second one is not really that big and changes looks sane to me. -- :wq! sphinx.debdiff.gz Description: application/gunzip sphinx_code.

Re: babel and illuminator

Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Greetings, > > I just uploaded a fixed babel package, version 1.2.0.dfsg-6, with one > tiny change vs. -5 which closes bug 483324 and allows illuminator to > build. Please unblock the new babel and old illuminator 0.11.0-1 > (uploaded 3/24) so they can enter testing and

Re: Please unblock eject/2.1.5+deb1-1

Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Hi. > > Please allow eject into testing. It only contains a translation update > and some very minor fixes, but due to me moving some files around in > the .orig.tar.gz the debdiff is very huge. > > I realize that me finally fixing the upstream tarball to make live of >

babel and illuminator

Greetings, I just uploaded a fixed babel package, version 1.2.0.dfsg-6, with one tiny change vs. -5 which closes bug 483324 and allows illuminator to build. Please unblock the new babel and old illuminator 0.11.0-1 (uploaded 3/24) so they can enter testing and the release. Thank you, -Adam -- G

Re: What to do with brasero?

Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le vendredi 01 août 2008 à 12:56 +0200, Bastian Blank a écrit : >> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: >>> * Open a RC bug wrt. the FTBFS on alpha (why isn’t it open yet?) >> This have to be done anyway. The code is broken about the usag

Re: policycoreutils 2.0.49-5

Russell Coker wrote: > Please include version 2.0.49-5 in Lenny. The progress report is necessary > to > stop users getting confused and pushing reset on an autorelabel operation. > > It's uploaded to unstable now. Took till some time, though arrived by now. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UN

Re: Please unblock eject/2.1.5+deb1-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi. > > Please allow eject into testing. It only contains a translation update > and some very minor fixes, but due to me moving some files around in > the .orig.tar.gz the debdiff is very huge. No obje

Re: What to do with brasero?

Le vendredi 01 août 2008 à 12:56 +0200, Bastian Blank a écrit : > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > * Open a RC bug wrt. the FTBFS on alpha (why isn’t it open yet?) > > This have to be done anyway. The code is broken about the usage of > the va_list type.

Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)

Hi, On Fri, 01.08.2008 at 12:49:00 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > + * added python-docutils (closes: #493205) > > + * suggests -> recommends due to the high usability impact > > + * fixed python-webunit at 1.3.8 (compatib

Please unblock eject/2.1.5+deb1-1

Hi. Please allow eject into testing. It only contains a translation update and some very minor fixes, but due to me moving some files around in the .orig.tar.gz the debdiff is very huge. I realize that me finally fixing the upstream tarball to make live of translators easier coinsided badly with

Re: Would iso-codes qualify for a freeze exception?

On Friday 01 August 2008 11:28:32 Tobias Quathamer wrote: > On Friday 01 August 2008 11:24:37 Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:23:31AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > I was almost sure there was a library in iso-codes, there isn't I stand > > > corrected hence it falls in t

Re: Please allow multipath-tools and multipath-tools-initramfs into lenny

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:21:13PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:25:52AM +, Guido Günther wrote: > > > Changes to multipath-tools 0.4.8-11: > > I believe this package has an udeb, but it's fine by me if d-i agrees. >

Re: Allow debian-edu-install to propagate to testing

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:21:54PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi. The current debian-edu-install package in unstable (0.672) got > > No objection unblocked -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EM

Re: request for a freeze exception for mercurial

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 11:31:35AM +, Vincent Danjean wrote: > Hi, > > mercurial 1.0.1-3 (currently in lenny) is incompatible with > python-subversion >= 1.5 (it works with python-subversion 1.4 that > is not in lenny anymore). This bug does not touch the core mercurial > operations but it

Re: Please unblock util-vserver

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:57:38PM +, Micah Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > I am writing to request the manual unblock of util-vserver > 0.30.216~r2750-3 which was uploaded last night to fix a RC bug in the > package that was uploaded before the freeze, but had not migrated to > testing yet. This ve

Re: please remove icedove/2.0.0.14-1/armel from testing

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 02:36:52PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:11:06PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > This might actually be a job for ftpmaster removals (since > > the testing hints is not aware of archs?), but I'll ask for > > feeback forst. > Architecture removals ar

Please unblock util-vserver

Hi, I am writing to request the manual unblock of util-vserver 0.30.216~r2750-3 which was uploaded last night to fix a RC bug in the package that was uploaded before the freeze, but had not migrated to testing yet. This version of the package only has the fix for the RC bug #491072 and no other ch

Re: Please allow multipath-tools and multipath-tools-initramfs into lenny

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:25:52AM +, Guido Günther wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Changes to multipath-tools 0.4.8-11: >> >> RC Bug: >> * [4f8a5d1] Call multipath via udev on block device add/change events

Re: Allow debian-edu-install to propagate to testing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi. The current debian-edu-install package in unstable (0.672) got > udebs, and are thus blocked from propagating into testing > automatically. It has had its required resting time, and it would be >

Re: unblocking partman-multipath

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 08:58:19AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > RT would be acceptable for you to have this mini transition now? That > is the last missing part to fully support multipath on d-i. Unfortunately that's not entirely true: we're also still lacking grub2 patches but Robert wanted to

Re: please remove icedove/2.0.0.14-1/armel from testing

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:11:06PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > This might actually be a job for ftpmaster removals (since > the testing hints is not aware of archs?), but I'll ask for > feeback forst. Architecture removals are done by the ftp team. > Until icedove is based on xulrunner-1.9, icedo

please remove icedove/2.0.0.14-1/armel from testing

Hi, This might actually be a job for ftpmaster removals (since the testing hints is not aware of archs?), but I'll ask for feeback forst. Until icedove is based on xulrunner-1.9, icedove wont work on armel. The old version in testing crashes on armel, and the new version in unstable doesn't even

Re: unblocking partman-multipath

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:28:24AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > please unblock partman-

Re: openal-soft hppa giveback

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:48:48AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Hi RMs, Hi Paul (not a RM is speaking), > openal-soft got hit by cmake failing to build on hppa due to a bug in > glibc. Please give-back: > > gb openal-soft_1:1.4.272-1 . hppa just built and uploaded Sorry to have forgot about your

request for a freeze exception for mercurial

Hi, mercurial 1.0.1-3 (currently in lenny) is incompatible with python-subversion >= 1.5 (it works with python-subversion 1.4 that is not in lenny anymore). This bug does not touch the core mercurial operations but it prevents any conversion from subversion repository to mercurial. Upstream

Allow debian-edu-install to propagate to testing

Hi. The current debian-edu-install package in unstable (0.672) got udebs, and are thus blocked from propagating into testing automatically. It has had its required resting time, and it would be great if it was allowed to propagate into testing. It was uploaded before the freeze. Cc til debian-b

Re: What to do with brasero?

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > * Open a RC bug wrt. the FTBFS on alpha (why isn’t it open yet?) This have to be done anyway. The code is broken about the usage of the va_list type. Bastian -- Earth -- mother of the most beautiful women in the universe.

Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)

Hi Cyril, On Fri, 01.08.2008 at 12:27:49 +0200, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/08/2008): > > + * fixed python-webunit at 1.3.8 (compatibilty issue with 1.3.9) > > -Depends: python (>= 2.4), python-central (>= 0.5), python-pkg-resources, > > pyt

Re: What to do with brasero?

Le vendredi 01 août 2008 à 12:51 +0200, Philipp Kern a écrit : > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Here is the course of action I propose: > > * Removal of the alpha binary in testing; it’s not a good idea to > > release with a discrepancy in versio

Re: What to do with brasero?

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Here is the course of action I propose: > * Removal of the alpha binary in testing; it’s not a good idea to > release with a discrepancy in versions anyway, and we can’t > provide security support. I guess yo

Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)

Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > + * added python-docutils (closes: #493205) > + * suggests -> recommends due to the high usability impact > + * fixed python-webunit at 1.3.8 (compatibilty issue with 1.3.9) Rejected. Don't use =, but Conflict with >= 1.3.9 or whatever the correct vers

What to do with brasero?

Hi, brasero 0.8.0-1 (uploaded before the freeze) is ready to migrate, but it failed to build on alpha and therefore won't migrate. However version 0.7.1-3 which is in testing already failed to build on alpha, but it was forced in testing nevertheless; alpha still has 0.6.1-1 in testing. Here is

Re: funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)

Hi. Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/08/2008): > + * fixed python-webunit at 1.3.8 (compatibilty issue with 1.3.9) > -Depends: python (>= 2.4), python-central (>= 0.5), python-pkg-resources, > python-webunit > +Depends: python (>= 2.4), python-central (>= 0.5), python-pkg-resources, > pytho

funkload update to 1.6.2 (fixes: #493205)

Hi, I've re-rolled the current package with a different changelog and control file. This is the diff: === modified file 'debian/changelog' --- debian/changelog2008-07-29 08:31:28 + +++ debian/changelog2008-08-01 10:03:35 + @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +funkload (1.6.2-5) unstable; urgency=lo

Re: Would iso-codes qualify for a freeze exception?

On Friday 01 August 2008 11:24:37 Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:23:31AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > I was almost sure there was a library in iso-codes, there isn't I stand > > corrected hence it falls in the same category as documentations and it's > > probably okay. > >

Re: Would iso-codes qualify for a freeze exception?

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:23:31AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 08:05:45AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 06:51:58AM +, Tobias Quathamer wrote: > > > Dear release team, > > > > > > the package iso-codes has accumulated some translation upda

Re: Would iso-codes qualify for a freeze exception?

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 08:05:45AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 06:51:58AM +, Tobias Quathamer wrote: > > Dear release team, > > > > the package iso-codes has accumulated some translation updates since the > > last > > upload. I'm wondering whether you would grant

Re: unblocking partman-multipath

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:28:24AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > please unblock partman-multipath. There's no version in lenny yet. This > > way folks building custom installers (due to #

Re: Please allow multipath-tools and multipath-tools-initramfs into lenny

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:25:52AM +, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi, > > Changes to multipath-tools 0.4.8-11: > > RC Bug: > * [4f8a5d1] Call multipath via udev on block device add/change events This > helps slow devices when either /etc/init.d/multipath-tools-boot or the > initramfs s

Re: seeking freeze exception for tbb

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:55:23PM +, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > - the inclusion of proper SONAME support This is an important change that doesn't meet the freeze exception guidelines. So sorry, but no thanks. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[

Re: policycoreutils 2.0.49-5

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:09:32AM +, Russell Coker wrote: > Please include version 2.0.49-5 in Lenny. The progress report is necessary > to > stop users getting confused and pushing reset on an autorelabel operation. > > It's uploaded to unstable now. Well we can't decide if I can't see

Re: Would iso-codes qualify for a freeze exception?

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 06:51:58AM +, Tobias Quathamer wrote: > Dear release team, > > the package iso-codes has accumulated some translation updates since the last > upload. I'm wondering whether you would grant a freeze exception if I upload > to unstable. Please note that this would be a

Re: gnucash freeze exemption request

Hallo Thomas, am Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:08:18PM -0700 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > Gnucash 2.2.6 has been released. See previous emails from me on the > subject. I'm now seeking approval to upload 2.2.6 and have it hinted > for testing, which will (among other things) close all the RC and t

Re: pam

On Friday 01 August 2008 16:47, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:08:49PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=451722 > > > > Is pam getting an exception from the freeze? > > Yes, I discussed this with the release team