dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 02:29:38PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I'm wondering who wrote:
> > > > As linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf was not ready in time we decided to
> > > > skip it for r4 and include it in r5.
> >
> > Frans Pop wrote:
> > > Well done folks. You've again
Hi folks
Please unblock perl/5.10.0-11.1. It fixes a double free condition which
breaks several other packages including svk and may be security
sensitive.
I'm no maintainer of that package, but if they don't react on mails or
even a NMU then I don't know what do to. I got promises for an upload,
Please unblock cdebootstrap/0.5.3, devmapper/2:1.02.27-3, lvm2/2.02.39-2
and s390-tools/1.6.2-1.
Bastian
--
We have phasers, I vote we blast 'em!
-- Bailey, "The Corbomite Maneuver", stardate 1514.2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Hi folks.
I've just fixed the (only until now) RC bug on graphviz, and currently
I've prepared an experimental upload for now, so that you can tell me
what changes you would (not) allow in lenny through unstable:
| graphviz (2.20.2-1) experimental; urgency=low
|
| * New upstream bugfix release.
I would like to get version 0.2.11-2 of mcstrans in Lenny.
It changes to use libcap2, while this is a trivial change it also prevents the
2.6.25 kernel logging warning messages (which we don't want to have happening
all through Lenny).
It allows correct restarting. While there is no bug report
So, we are late with OpenJDK for lenny. I still think lenny would
benefit from having OpenJDK. I'm proposing the following steps,
realizing that not all of them probably can be realized.
- The current 6b11-2 package is not yet ready for migration. We will
need a -3 upload which properly will f
On 27/07/2008 Luk Claes wrote:
> > I'd like to request a freeze exception for cryptsetup 1.0.6-4. I didn't
> > upload it to unstable yet, but if no objections are raised, I'll do so
> > tomorrow.
>
> Cc-ing debian-boot as it contains a udeb... no objections from the RT.
Ok, I just uploaded crypts
I uploaded geda-symbols 1:1.4.0-2 just after the freeze announcement
came through. The only change is to fix important bug #454938, which is
a puiparts "files left after install-upgrade-purge" bug.
Please consider letting it in to lenny. If not, no harm done; most users
won't be affected, because
I uploaded www-sql 0.5.7-21 just about the time I received the final
freeze announcement, so I'm not sure if it missed out or not. It fixes
#438897 (incorrect dependencies).
Would you consider letting it back in to testing?
It hasn't been in testing in ages due to this bug (I'm slack), so I'm
not
Aehmmm, sorry ...
On So, 27 Jul 2008, Norbert Preining wrote:
> the Debian TeX Team would like to ask you to unblock
> tex-common 1.11.1
should have been
tex-common 1.11.2
> +chown root:staff /usr/local/texmf/emacs
> +chmod 2775 /usr/local/share/texmf
that "emacs"
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-27 11:36]:
> > Please have a look at the following packages with solved RC bugs to see
> > if it's ok to unblock them:
> >
> > * busybox
> > * gnumach
> > * live-installer
> > * mdadm
> > * qcontrol
> > * rootskel-gtk
> > * udev
>
> otavio, any comm
Cristian Greco wrote:
> Hi release team,
>
> I'd like to ask a freeze exception for qbittorrent_1.1.0~rc1-2.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request a freeze exception for apache2-mpm-itk 2.2.6-02-1.
> It contains a single bugfix (a security hardening) that was brought to my
> attention only today. The bugfix is a oneliner in the upstream code (I am
> upstream for the package myself), p
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 27, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well, it can not migrate because it was compiled against libdb4.7-dev,
>> so changing the build dependency to libdb-dev or libdb4.6-dev should do
>> the trick...
> Done. Please add an exception for inn2 2.4.5-2, -1 has been
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please allow exim4 4.69-6 to propagate to lenny. It was uploaded before
> the total freeze, however exim4 was frozen at an earlier point of
> time, probably with the libraries.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 01:27:57AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> * Hubert Chathi [Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:35:20 -0400]:
>>
>>> How is that? noweb just depends on gawk, iconx, and libc6, and the
>>> dependency on iconx is unversioned, so shouldn't it be satisfied with
>>> the vers
Hi release team,
I'd like to ask a freeze exception for qbittorrent_1.1.0~rc1-2.
Actually, version in testing is 1.1.0~beta3-1. I uploaded 1.1.0~rc1-1 on
2008-07-24, which fixed a severity grave bug (#491453) and a FTBFS on
arm and armel arches [1], but there was a mistake with patch system so
to
Hi,
On Sun Jul 27, 2008 at 15:19:25 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 02:29:38PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I'm wondering who wrote:
> > > > As linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf was not ready in time we decided to
> > > > skip it for r4 and include it in r5.
> >
> > Frans Po
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (27/07/2008):
> How's this?
1 typo.
> -No known issues.
> +Partitions encrypted using loop-AES will not be accessable after
> installation.
accessible
> +This issue is due to the absence of loop-aes kernel modul
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 02:29:38PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I'm wondering who wrote:
> > > As linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf was not ready in time we decided to
> > > skip it for r4 and include it in r5.
>
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > Well done folks. You've again managed to break at least part of
Hi,
I'd like to request a freeze exception for apache2-mpm-itk 2.2.6-02-1.
It contains a single bugfix (a security hardening) that was brought to my
attention only today. The bugfix is a oneliner in the upstream code (I am
upstream for the package myself), plus an added call to autoheader.
debdiff
Hi all,
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> I kindly request your advice on handling three RC bugs in TeXLive
> packages,
will someone among you find time to handle this issue? You are probably
aware that the texlive cannot simply be removed if their RC bug seems
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 07:22:21PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >> New package loop-aes-etchnhalf:
> >> architectures in updates: s390 all amd64 i386 powerpc arm sparc alpha
> >> ia64 mips mipsel hppa version in updates: 3.2c-2~etchnhalf.2
> >> Rationales:
> >> - 3.2c-2~etchnhalf.1: loop-aes-etch
Dear Release Team,
the Debian TeX Team would like to ask you to unblock
tex-common 1.11.1
Due to extended net-absence (working as a mountain guide the summer)
I (we) completely forgot to upload the package, but it wouldn't been
important. But just 1h ago a serious bug was discovered which
Are packages which are removed from unstable during the freeze still
automatically removed from testing?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-19 17:22]:
> Please have a look at the following packages with solved RC bugs to see
> if it's ok to unblock them:
>
> * busybox
> * gnumach
> * live-installer
> * mdadm
> * qcontrol
> * rootskel-gtk
> * udev
otavio, any comments on these?
--
Martin Michl
I'm wondering who wrote:
> > As linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf was not ready in time we decided to
> > skip it for r4 and include it in r5.
Frans Pop wrote:
> Well done folks. You've again managed to break at least part of the
> functionality of Debian Installer and, more importantly, left us
Dear Release-Team,
I would like to ask for an exception of my package unionfs-fuse. A new version
has been release yesterday, which fixes one critical bug (I discovered myself
on Thursday). The bug is a deadlock happening on unions of /etc and /var,
when any syslog() call is made by unionfs-fus
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 04:00:53PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>
> Now, so as not to have everyone contact us at once about packages we
> know we won't approve, here are the guidelines for changes that will be
> accepted into testing during the freeze:
>
I uploaded a new version of tbb
On Jul 27, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it can not migrate because it was compiled against libdb4.7-dev,
> so changing the build dependency to libdb-dev or libdb4.6-dev should do
> the trick...
Done. Please add an exception for inn2 2.4.5-2, -1 has been in unstable
for one month.
>> New package loop-aes-etchnhalf:
>> architectures in updates: s390 all amd64 i386 powerpc arm sparc alpha
>> ia64 mips mipsel hppa version in updates: 3.2c-2~etchnhalf.2
>> Rationales:
>> - 3.2c-2~etchnhalf.1: loop-aes-etchnhalf - source compatible w/
>> etchnhalf kernel
> As linux-module
I been using the unsubscribe email and confirmed it like 5 times now,
please stop sending me, what do i have to do to stop recieving email!?
You are bordering on spam.
Every week i get a new one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Daniel,
am Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 06:53:15PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> rdiff-backup 1.1.17-1 fixes #410586 and #486653, was uploaded on
> 2008-07-17 already, but unfortunately didn't make it to testing before
> the freeze.
as you might have read in the announcement, packages uploaded t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ In case a reply from me is necessary, note that I'll be away again
from today evening until next wednesday evening. ]
Hi,
rdiff-backup 1.1.17-1 fixes #410586 and #486653, was uploaded on
2008-07-17 already, but unfortunately didn't make it to testi
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 01:27:57AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Hubert Chathi [Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:35:20 -0400]:
>
> > How is that? noweb just depends on gawk, iconx, and libc6, and the
> > dependency on iconx is unversioned, so shouldn't it be satisfied with
> > the version of icon that's in
Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Altough Lenny is frozen, I think it would still be a good idea
>>> to get this version into Lenny.
>>>
>>> The reasons:
>>> - The current version is based on an 1.5
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Altough Lenny is frozen, I think it would still be a good idea
>> to get this version into Lenny.
>>
>> The reasons:
>> - The current version is based on an 1.5 years old (2007-04-30)
>> SVN snapshot
>
> What abou
Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Altough Lenny is frozen, I think it would still be a good idea
> to get this version into Lenny.
>
> The reasons:
> - The current version is based on an 1.5 years old (2007-04-30)
> SVN snapshot
What about "freeze" did you not understand? Rejecte
severity 459324 wishlist
merge 459324 473772
retitle 459324 gnome-main-menu: Official upstream release (0.9.10) available,
fixing several memory leaks
thanks
The new upstream release 0.9.10 is available at:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gnome-main-menu/0.9/
I also attached diffs of th
Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like you to unblock tk8.4 8.4.19-2. The main goal of this
> upload is to workaround bug [1] (see also thread started with [2]).
> I'd like too see this fix in lenny (even if x11proto-core 7.0.13
> itself will not go to lenny).
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
T
Hi!
I would like you to unblock tk8.4 8.4.19-2. The main goal of this
upload is to workaround bug [1] (see also thread started with [2]).
I'd like too see this fix in lenny (even if x11proto-core 7.0.13
itself will not go to lenny).
[1]
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2
Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request an unblock hint for xorg-server:
> unblock xorg-server/2:1.4.2-2
>
> This version fixes some parallel build issues in the packaging, and
> cherry-picks 3 bug fixes from upstream.
unblocked
> There'll be at least one further upload before relea
Jonas Meurer wrote:
> hello debian-release,
Hi
> I'd like to request a freeze exception for cryptsetup 1.0.6-4. I didn't
> upload it to unstable yet, but if no objections are raised, I'll do so
> tomorrow.
Cc-ing debian-boot as it contains a udeb... no objections from the RT.
Cheers
Luk
> at
43 matches
Mail list logo
