On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 01:13:50AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
> there was one bit about the handling of the freeze that was not well
> communicated in the previous release announcement:
>
> | Packages that are present in unstable the day we freeze will be
> | automatically allowed into tes
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-22 01:46]:
> * Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-22 00:12]:
>
> > * Rafael Laboissiere [Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:32:56 +0200]:
> >
> > > Please, give back plplot/5.9.0-8 on ia64. The last autobuild on mundy
> > > failed with a very strange e
* Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-22 00:12]:
> * Rafael Laboissiere [Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:32:56 +0200]:
>
> > Please, give back plplot/5.9.0-8 on ia64. The last autobuild on mundy
> > failed with a very strange error message and I suspect that it may be
> > related to that specific mac
* Rafael Laboissiere [Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:32:56 +0200]:
> Please, give back plplot/5.9.0-8 on ia64. The last autobuild on mundy
> failed with a very strange error message and I suspect that it may be
> related to that specific machine and perhaps not a real bug in the package.
Hmprf, given back,
* Arjan Oosting [Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:51:57 +0200]:
> I would like to request a binNMU of hat on arm mips mipsel powerpc
> as it has not been build with ghc 6.8.2 which is keeping hat from
> testing.
Scheduled (for m68k too).
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:57:18PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Cristian Greco a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 04:30:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> >> Cristian Greco a écrit :
> >>> Moreover, have you any suggestion about the patch I submitted?
> >> It looks ok, though I haven't
Cristian Greco a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 04:30:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
>> Cristian Greco a écrit :
>>> Moreover, have you any suggestion about the patch I submitted?
>> It looks ok, though I haven't looked at other parts of the code. If you
>> want I can do a test build on ar
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 14:03, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:44:23PM +, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> On 2008-07-19, Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > -okular, the new KDE 4 document viewer. (source split from KDE 4's
>> > kdegr
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:03:42PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:44:23PM +, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On 2008-07-19, Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > -okular, the new KDE 4 document viewer. (source split from KDE 4's
> > > kdegraphi
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:44:23PM +, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2008-07-19, Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > -okular, the new KDE 4 document viewer. (source split from KDE 4's
> > kdegraphics)
>
> Is it indended to replace or accompany kpdf for Lenny?
I hope not
On 2008-07-19, Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> -okular, the new KDE 4 document viewer. (source split from KDE 4's
> kdegraphics)
Is it indended to replace or accompany kpdf for Lenny?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
> I seem to recall volunteering to admin these boxes, since it was pretty
> obvious that no one was giving them any love, but it fell on deaf ears.
The boxes have admins that are keeping them up to date, what is needed is a
working kernel with security updates.
I remember you (or maybe thibaut?)
> FWIW, the hppa experimental buildds both run 2.6.22 kernels and seem to
> do fine. Probably not a very good situation security-wise, though.
not really. Ruby triggers the same Kernel bug at least on simonides.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Develo
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:17:02PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Ruby 1.9 is still the development version of Ruby, but it will become
> > > the stable version in december. It's
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Ruby 1.9 is still the development version of Ruby, but it will become
> > the stable version in december. It's not really cutting-edge stuff
> > anymore, and works very well everywhere
Please allow sysvinit version 2.86.ds1-60 to propagate into testing.
It fixes two issues I consider release critical. This is the
changelog:
sysvinit (2.86.ds1-60) unstable; urgency=low
* Make bootmisc.sh depend on $remote_fs instead of $local_fs, to
make sure it is executed after moun
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 04:30:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Cristian Greco a écrit :
> > Moreover, have you any suggestion about the patch I submitted?
>
> It looks ok, though I haven't looked at other parts of the code. If you
> want I can do a test build on arm or armel with this patch.
Perhaps we should issue a special DSA about openssh fixes in d-i
once the next point release is available? In particular, anyone
using d-i with network-console needs to make sure to update their
installation media / netboot files.
Also, network-console's copying of the ssh_host_rsa_key in
finish-
Cristian Greco a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:13:22PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
>>> Build on arm failed as it has been foreseen, but the error is quite
>>> different from previous one (armel). Please, can anyone help me with
>>> this log [1]? I'd like to fix this FTBFS in time for len
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:34:18PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> please binNMU apache2-mpm-itk to build against apache2-src 2.2.9-6.
Scheduled.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Debian
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Ruby 1.9 is still the development version of Ruby, but it will become
> the stable version in december. It's not really cutting-edge stuff
> anymore, and works very well everywhere else.
>
> I'm a bit annoyed by this issue: the problem seems to be a ke
On jeu, jui 17, 2008 at 11:25:41 +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:04:18AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > >> Junio: if you could just apply them, tag the result as v1.4.4.5 and
> >
Hi all,
I might add one point:
On So, 20 Jul 2008, Frank K�ster wrote:
> #477060, amslatex license; Source Package: texlive-base
Removing amslatex would severly reduce the usability of TeX on Debian.
Nowadays practically all articles using some formulas are using amslatex
packages, and this is s
Hi Luk,
Luk Claes schrieb:
> Christoph Martin wrote:
>> Hi release team,
>
> Hi Christoph
>
>> The l10n team asked for a new upload of openssl to include the pending
>> l10n updates. All the changes for this packages were checked in into
>> alioth.
>>
>> Would you consider letting in a new Deb
24 matches
Mail list logo
