On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:36:06AM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2008 05:44:45 Michael Goetze wrote:
> > Package: madwifi-source
> > Version: 0.9.2+r1842.20061207-2etch2
> >
> > When I try to compile madwifi-source against linux-2.6.24-etchnhalf.
> > 1-486, I get the following e
Kel Modderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately, I don't think etch will see another update to fix this
> problem. A backport from sid/testing could be done, the porter would
> need to drop debhelper compat level. However, the delta between madwifi
> upstream in etch and sid/testing is
On Monday 21 July 2008 05:44:45 Michael Goetze wrote:
> Package: madwifi-source
> Version: 0.9.2+r1842.20061207-2etch2
>
> When I try to compile madwifi-source against linux-2.6.24-etchnhalf.
> 1-486, I get the following error:
>
> ...
> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/madwifi'
> C
Please unblock libidn/1.9-1
It uses an upstream released tarball with a fix for the RC bug 484093
It has been in unstable for 10 days
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Please, give back plplot/5.9.0-8 on ia64. The last autobuild on mundy
failed with a very strange error message and I suspect that it may be
related to that specific machine and perhaps not a real bug in the package.
Thanks,
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Hi,
please binNMU apache2-mpm-itk to build against apache2-src 2.2.9-6.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Stefan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: madwifi-source
Version: 0.9.2+r1842.20061207-2etch2
When I try to compile madwifi-source against linux-2.6.24-etchnhalf.
1-486, I get the following error:
...
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/madwifi'
Checking requirements... ok.
Checking kernel configuration... FAILED
Pl
[late CC to pkern and debian-release]
unmerge 422085
unmerge 434212
unmerge 417256
reopen 434212
reopen 417256
severity 434212 normal
severity 417256 normal
quit
Hi,
thanks for the hint! I've looked through the bugs again and found the
following:
(1) #422085 (and the lengthly discussion) is pa
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:57:56PM +0100, MikeJJ wrote:
> The other day when doing some updates for these packages:
> dictionaries-common
> wamerican
> liblapack3gf
> wbritish
> i noticed the terminal view reported that glib 2.16.4 should be used
> instead of 2.16.3, but it installed the updates
Dear release team,
I kindly request your advice on handling three RC bugs in TeXLive
packages, and maybe ask for a lenny-ignore tag. Although all bug
numbers look quite recent, the first two are actually very old. But
these issues were originally reported against existing bugs in teTeX
which coll
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:13:22PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Build on arm failed as it has been foreseen, but the error is quite
> > different from previous one (armel). Please, can anyone help me with
> > this log [1]? I'd like to fix this FTBFS in time for lenny.
> >
>
> This FTBFS is mo
Cristian Greco a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 02:27:31AM +0200, Cristian Greco wrote:
>
>> --- qbittorrent-1.1.0beta3.orig/src/realprogressbarthread.cpp
>> +++ qbittorrent-1.1.0beta3/src/realprogressbarthread.cpp
>> @@ -141,7 +141,8 @@
>> if (end > array.size())
>> end = arr
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 02:27:31AM +0200, Cristian Greco wrote:
> --- qbittorrent-1.1.0beta3.orig/src/realprogressbarthread.cpp
> +++ qbittorrent-1.1.0beta3/src/realprogressbarthread.cpp
> @@ -141,7 +141,8 @@
> if (end > array.size())
> end = array.size();
> int start_int
-=| Luk Claes, Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:47:57AM +0200 |=-
> Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > Please bump the urgency of the following upload:
> >> libsql-abstract-perl (1.24-1) unstable; urgency=low
> >> .
> >>* New upstream release. Closes: #490625.
> >
> > That bug causes FTBFS in (at least) libcl
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 02:32:54PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Is there any evidence that the package builds on *any* architecture?
Yes, it seems to do.
> > AFAICT, none of the binaries in the archive have corresponding logs on
> > buildd.debian.org.
They were not built o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> please allow pango1.0 1.20.5-1 and glib2.0 2.16.4-2 migrate to testing.
>> Both have important bugfixes.
>
> Both need ack from debian-boot
No objection
- --
O T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>> Andrew Pollock wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can you please let dhcp3 3.1.1-3 into testing?
>>
>> unblocked
>
> Though need ack from debian-boot first...
No objection
- --
O T A V I O
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:57:41 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
>> [Peter Green]
>>> *The "rc" bug (491362) that is open against openjdk gets downgraded (I
>>> beleive it should be downgraded but as a non-dd I don't belive it is
>>> my place to downgrade a bug based on
Hi,
The other day when doing some updates for these packages:
dictionaries-common
wamerican
liblapack3gf
wbritish
i noticed the terminal view reported that glib 2.16.4 should be used
instead of 2.16.3, but it installed the updates anyway.
Shouldn't glib be updated to the version which these update
Hi,
I would like to request a binNMU of hat on arm mips mipsel powerpc
as it has not been build with ghc 6.8.2 which is keeping hat from
testing.
Greetings Arjan
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
Arjan Oosting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you give back uuagc/0.9.6-1 on arm and powerpc? The previous
> builds were failing due to a bug in libghc6-uulib-dev 0.9.5-4 and
> libgch6-uulib-dev missing on powerpc.
> As libghc6-uulib-dev 0.9.5-5 is now available on both architectures
> the builds should s
Hi,
Could you give back uuagc/0.9.6-1 on arm and powerpc? The previous
builds were failing due to a bug in libghc6-uulib-dev 0.9.5-4 and
libgch6-uulib-dev missing on powerpc.
As libghc6-uulib-dev 0.9.5-5 is now available on both architectures
the builds should succeed now.
Thanks,
Arjan
[Julien Cristau]
> Is there any evidence that the package builds on *any* architecture?
> AFAICT, none of the binaries in the archive have corresponding logs
> on buildd.debian.org.
Ah, good point. Perhaps it only build on the maintainers machine. If
that is the case, it is definitely a serious
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:57:41 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Peter Green]
> > *The "rc" bug (491362) that is open against openjdk gets downgraded (I
> > beleive it should be downgraded but as a non-dd I don't belive it is
> > my place to downgrade a bug based on an unclear bit of the rc p
[Peter Green]
> *The "rc" bug (491362) that is open against openjdk gets downgraded (I
> beleive it should be downgraded but as a non-dd I don't belive it is
> my place to downgrade a bug based on an unclear bit of the rc policy)
I agree that it should be downgraded, as the package never
successfu
peter green wrote:
>
>> Since openjdk is now available in main, wouldn't that be the best
>> solution?
>>
> It would if it was in lenny but unfortunately openjdk was delayed hugely
> by license issues :(. Now we have a situation where afiact openjdk will
> only make it into lenny if one of the
Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> [resent with correct To: address]
>
> Dear release team,
Hi
> Please bump the urgency of the following upload:
>
> -=| Debian Bug Tracking System, Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:45:03AM +
> |=-
>> libsql-abstract-perl (1.24-1) unstable; urgency=low
>> .
>>* New upstre
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please give back haskell-irc/0.4.2-1 on arm and powerpc; builds were failing
> previously due to ghc6 >= 6.8 missing on those archs.
given back
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Hello,
Hi
> ffmpeg2theora version 0.21-0.1 has successfully been built on all
> arches on 28th June and has no RC bugs at this point. However, for
> some reason it did not get to the Install stage on the mipsel buildd
> (rem). I have enquired about this in the past a
(added Cc on debian-hppa@)
On 17/07/08 at 21:32 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > ruby1.9 FTBFS on hppa (see #478717). The version currently in testing is
> > already missing the hppa build, and there's no plan to solve that on our
> > side. (it requires help from hppa porters).
>
> Ok, but this pr
30 matches
Mail list logo
