please give back pgapack on amd64
It builds with pbuilder on my amd64
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Giveback:
gb icedtea-gcjwebplugin . i386
DepWaits:
(not sure how to specify these)
icedtea-gcjwebplugin on openjdk-6-jdk (arm mips mipsel powerpc)
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
please hint together poco clamfs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 13/07/2008 Jonas Meurer wrote:
> On 12/07/2008 Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > On 11444 March 1977, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> >
> > > At least one lenny release manager mentioned that he doesn't object
> > > against the change and that it's not to late for lenny either yet
> > > [7],[8].
> >
> > Those tw
Hi all,
Probably a week or two ago I contacted Lucas Nussbaum to ask him if he could
run lintian on the results of his packages rebuild so they could be compared
against the results from lintian.d.o to detect package changes (i.e. new or
less lintian-detected issues).
I have just started to co
On 12/07/2008 Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11444 March 1977, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>
> > At least one lenny release manager mentioned that he doesn't object
> > against the change and that it's not to late for lenny either yet
> > [7],[8].
>
> Those two links clearly say "Its better to not have force
On 11444 March 1977, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> At least one lenny release manager mentioned that he doesn't object
> against the change and that it's not to late for lenny either yet
> [7],[8].
Those two links clearly say "Its better to not have force involved" and
let the maintainers agree on it. Wh
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 05:40:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:25:41 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>
> > The etchnhalf team and the Frans Pop (on behalf of the d-i team) have
> > drafted release notes for the etchnhalf portion of the upcoming 4.0r4
> > release. We would
Hello,
I hope this is the correct list to post this, otherwise apologises and
please forward this message to the correct list.
Since yesterday I have these problems (with two different computers) when
updating the packages:
http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/contrib/binary-i386/Packa
Tobias Toedter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if D-I people don't object, iso-codes could migrate to testing today.
>
> unblock iso-codes/3.1-1
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> if D-I people don't object, iso-codes could migrate to testing today.
>
> unblock iso-codes/3.1-1
No objection
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- --
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:25:41 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> The etchnhalf team and the Frans Pop (on behalf of the d-i team) have
> drafted release notes for the etchnhalf portion of the upcoming 4.0r4
> release. We would appreciate any feedback you may have.
>
> http://people.debian.org/~dan
Half a year supply for better enhancing and less cost.
http://guxeae.doctorbutgood.eu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 03:07:20PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 12:02:25PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> >> So what's does process to change a default look like usually? Simply do
> >> a coordinated upload of both old and new default packages with inverted
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 12:02:25PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>> So what's does process to change a default look like usually? Simply do
>> a coordinated upload of both old and new default packages with inverted
>> priorities?
>
> It is actually an unilateral decision of ftpmas
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 12:02:25PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> So what's does process to change a default look like usually? Simply do
> a coordinated upload of both old and new default packages with inverted
> priorities?
It is actually an unilateral decision of ftpmaster. When exim4 became
the
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 12.07.2008, 00:29 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
> > Am Freitag, den 11.07.2008, 17:44 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
> >> Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >>> I’m wondering what’s the rationale for only considering >= relations
> >>> there? If that would catch == as well, the burden of having ha
Philipp Kern writes:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 01:17:51PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > This package builds binary-indep package(s), which place file in the
> > location
> > /usr/share/pycentral/. python-central now puts these files
> > into a package independent dirctory /usr/share/pyshared. P
* Michael Biebl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080712 03:23]:
> I'm not entirely sure, what you expect from me or Joey.
>
> This topic was already discussed at length a few months ago [1] with a
> broad consent afaict that switching to rsyslog would be a good idea.
> Some issues were raised, and I tried t
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 01:17:51PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> This package builds binary-indep package(s), which place file in the location
> /usr/share/pycentral/. python-central now puts these files
> into a package independent dirctory /usr/share/pyshared. Please rebuild
> the package in a c
On 12/07/2008 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:58:10 +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>
> > About changing the default, I'm not not sure whether ftpmasters approval
> > is actually needed at all.
> > If Joey agrees, you could do a coordinated upload of both rsyslog and
> > sysklogd wit
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:58:10 +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> About changing the default, I'm not not sure whether ftpmasters approval
> is actually needed at all.
> If Joey agrees, you could do a coordinated upload of both rsyslog and
> sysklogd with inverted priorities, and that would be all, co
On 12/07/2008 Luk Claes wrote:
> > I'm not sure if it makes sense to restart a new discussion and reiterate
> > what's already been said. Or am I missing something?
> >
> > What imho is required now is an "Ok" from the release team and action by
> > the ftpmaster team.
>
> Well, you expect an 'Ok
On 12/07/2008 Michael Biebl wrote:
> This topic was already discussed at length a few months ago [1] with a
> broad consent afaict that switching to rsyslog would be a good idea.
> Some issues were raised, and I tried to address them.
I just checked the dependencies again, and found one packag
Hi,
if D-I people don't object, iso-codes could migrate to testing today.
unblock iso-codes/3.1-1
Regards,
Tobias
--
Tobias Toedter | There are 10 different kinds of people on the world --
Hamburg, Germany | those who understand binary and those who don't.
signature.asc
Description: This i
Luk Claes wrote:
> Joachim Breitner wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi
>
>> Am Freitag, den 11.07.2008, 17:44 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
>>> Joachim Breitner wrote:
I’m wondering what’s the rationale for only considering >= relations
there? If that would catch == as well, the burden of having haskell
>
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>> Jonas Meurer wrote:
>>> Hey debian-release,
>>
>> Hi
>>
>>> Just wanted to bring up that topic again. I believe it's far to late for
>>> changing the default syslog daemon for lenny to rsyslog, albeit I think
>>> it would be really desirable.
>>
>> It's no
27 matches
Mail list logo
