Re: What should go into Lenny, aka Where 2.0

Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:56:12PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> It's waiting for ruby1.9 which FTBFS on quite some architectures. >> >> It (mapserver) also FTBFS on hppa... >> > > Uhm this is quite weird, it seems that Jasper is not in sync > on HPPA boxes. The j2_enc

Re: buildd ordering: where to make a suggestion?

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:17:49PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I agree that enough buildd power would be a good thing, but that do > not mean the ordering should not be tuned. Packages will a lot of > reverse dependencies, and at least packages with reverse dependencies > the buildd que

Re: What should go into Lenny, aka Where 2.0

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:56:12PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > It's waiting for ruby1.9 which FTBFS on quite some architectures. > > It (mapserver) also FTBFS on hppa... > Uhm this is quite weird, it seems that Jasper is not in sync on HPPA boxes. The j2_encode_uuid (GeoJ2 support) is missing i

Re: buildd ordering: where to make a suggestion?

[Riku Voipio] > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=alpha&state=Needs-Build > > You will see that the order is Priority:, Section:, and within section > alphabetic. Uncompiled packages are last, and people with wanna-build > access can prioritize/deprioritize packages by hand. Thank you, did not

Re: buildd ordering: where to make a suggestion?

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 10:17:57AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > It's fairly clear looking at this excerpt from my "igloo" page that > buildd ordering is influenced by the alphabetical position of your > package. I know that there are other factors, and I remember having > read what the ordering

Re: What should go into Lenny, aka Where 2.0

Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Hi all > > > > This

Re: Unblock request of dpkg 1.14.20

Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > please unblock dpkg 1.14.20. Here are the changes contained in this > version: Unblocked + set needed aging to 15 days. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Freeze exception for shadow

Nicolas François wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 07:32:45PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> Nicolas François wrote: >> >>> I would like to make an update for shadow to fix a bug in the SHA password >>> encryption method. >> I guess that's for unstable? If so, please go ahead. > > shadow is no

Re: List of hints to ready to migrate packages

Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello RM team, > > Here goes a small hint set to the ready packages that won't hurt > installer at this moment. > > unblock console-data > unblock console-setup > unblock cryptsetup > unblock fontconfig > unblock gnupg > unblock win32-loader unblocked Cheers Luk --

Re: tnt{net,db} seems to requires hinting

On 2008-06-28 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 08:48:04AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > tntnet seems to finally be almost ready for propagation to testing, > > only a missing alpha build is keeping it out. > > easy tntdb/1.0.1-1 cxxtools/1.4.8-2 tntnet/1.6.3-3 >

Re: buildd ordering: where to make a suggestion?

* Jay Berkenbilt [Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:17:57 -0400]: Hello, I'll just reply to this bit, sorry for that: > It seems to me that ordering should be influenced by priority As far as I know, it is. And: > |psutils 1.17-26 |Needs build (23) |Needs build (216)| > |qpdf 2.0.2-1

buildd ordering: where to make a suggestion?

I apologize if debian-release is the wrong place to send this to. If it is and someone would like to reply telling me this, a hint as to where I should be reporting this to would be most helpful. Past experience suggests that sending email to individuals is neither productive nor helpful. It's

List of hints to ready to migrate packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello RM team, Here goes a small hint set to the ready packages that won't hurt installer at this moment. unblock console-data unblock console-setup unblock cryptsetup unblock fontconfig unblock gnupg unblock win32-loader TIA, - -- O T A

Re: [etch-and-half] release notes review

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 01:20:00PM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 01:26:40AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:41:23PM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:25:46PM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:25:41AM -0600

Re: [etch-and-half] release notes review

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 01:26:40AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:41:23PM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:25:46PM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:25:41AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > > > The etchnhalf team and the Frans Pop

Re: [etch-and-half] release notes review

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:55:44AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > first off, congrats to the team on getting to this point, and thanks! > I am looking forward to using the new Intel drivers in particular. Feel free to pull them from proposed-updates in the meantime :) Sorry for the late reply

Re: libmtp bumped soname, new pkg uploaded to experimental

* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-01 15:57]: > Upstream released version 0.3.0 of libmtp and the soname has bumped to > libmtp.so.8. I just uploaded version 0.3.0-1 of the Debian package to > experimental, which is obviously waiting in the NEW queue now. The package is available