On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Grant Grundler writes:
...
> > Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it?
> > Can I "apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3" on my hybrid system and get
> > the right version?
>
> gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.3-hppa64 are bot
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Grant Grundler writes:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > ...
> > > FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results
> > > than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to
I wrote:
> I will post the list of packages that appear to be affected by PR35662
> later today in a follow-up message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For your information, here is a list of source packages for which
current mips(el) binary packages in Sid are almost certainly affected by
gfortran PR35662 [
Package: gfortran-4.3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi gcc-4.3 maintainers,
Could you please include the patch fixing gfortran PR35662 [1] available
from [2]? This issue is likely to break a fairly large amount of
FORTRAN code that has been compiled with optimization level -O1 or
greater with
Grant Grundler writes:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> ...
> > FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results
> > than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in the *glibc*.
> >
> > So it *seems* HPPA is ready for gcc-4.3 by
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> xulrunner - i386, mipsel, powerpc, s390 [2][3] - +b2
i386 and powerpc now uploaded by me per hand.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Goswin von Brederlow writes:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
> >> Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
> >>include files in the multiarch locations.
> >> Bug-Url: http://bugs.debian.o
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080416 09:19]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Binutils are frozen for Lenny, so please no additional changes.
> I hope you do agree that binutils will need a freeze exception for
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4762
Package: sbackup
Version: 0.10.4
Followup-For: Bug #427697
sbackup tries to write its files under root:admin, but the 'admin' group does
not exist on default Debian installations.
Here is the relevant part of the code:
anx159《sbackup-0.10.4》$ grep admin -A3 -B3 sbackupd.py
# Check our user id
i
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 20:34]:
>> Description: The toolchain should be ready to handle libraries and
>>include files in the multiarch locations.
>> Bug-Url: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369064
>>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:24:09 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The way I understand it, they HAVE been pushing... and pushing... for
>> a long time... against a nonresponsive binutils maintainer. This
>> thread is just their latest, la
2008/4/16, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said:
> > libgmime had an ABI change (it changed sizeof(off_t)) without a soname
> > bump. As a short term work around, I've NMUed it with a package rename.
> > This means it will hit NEW, but when it comes ou
12 matches
Mail list logo
