Re: binNMUs for gfortran transition

2008-03-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 10 March 2008 at 21:23, Riku Voipio wrote: | | Chasing the long tail in gfortran transition.. The following packages | need a binNMU with latest r-base-dev to get rid of atlas3/reblas3 | depends. Aurel32, the list applies for kfreebsd-i386 as well. | | robustbase_0.2-8-1, Transition to gfortr

binNMU for ll-xist

2008-03-10 Thread Thomas Viehmann
ll-xist_2.15.5-1, correct python deps, 1, i386 Hi, unfortunately I missed that the generated binary dependencies of python packages differ depending on the default version and accidentally uploaded ll-xist built in an unclean (with respect to the default python version) chroot, making it u

Re: claws-mail_3.3.1-1, rebuild against newer libetpan13 fixes #469550, 1, alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

2008-03-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:00:57AM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: > Hi release inhabitants, > Subject says it all according wiki's binNMU instructions (I hope to have > done it right). Please CC me on replies because I'm not subscribed. The architecture list is meant to be space-delimited, not c

Re: binNMUs for gfortran transition

2008-03-10 Thread Thomas Weber
On 10/03/08 21:41 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > One more (missed due to being in contrib) > > octave-gpc_0.1.6-4, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, alpha arm i386 ia64 m68k > mips powerpc s390 NACK by maintainers, we'll do a sourceful upload. Riku, thanks for catching this. Thomas -- To

Re: maxima build failure on m68k

2008-03-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 04:31:42PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > > m68k buildd issues should probably go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for > > best results. :) > I have tried the architecture specific lists couple of times before and I > always found the response on debian-release to be much faster

Re: binNMUs for gfortran transition

2008-03-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 09:23:35PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > > Chasing the long tail in gfortran transition.. The following packages > need a binNMU with latest r-base-dev to get rid of atlas3/reblas3 > depends. Aurel32, the list applies for kfreebsd-i386 as well. > > robustbase_0.2-8-1, Transi

Re: maxima build failure on m68k

2008-03-10 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 01:14:14PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: >> I could not make sense of the build failure of maxima 5.13.0-3.1 on m68k >> [1]. It seems to be a random build failure (please correct me if I am >> wrong). Would it be possible to try compiling it

Re: Best practices for handling API (not ABI) breaks?

2008-03-10 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi Daniel, Daniel Burrows wrote: > I'm the maintainer of libsigc++-2.0, a typesafe callback library for > C++. Upstream has just released a new version, 2.2, which preserves the > version 2.0 ABI but is not source-compatible: programs that compiled > against the 2.0 series will break with this

Re: binNMUs for gfortran transition

2008-03-10 Thread Riku Voipio
One more (missed due to being in contrib) octave-gpc_0.1.6-4, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, alpha arm i386 ia64 m68k mips powerpc s390 on m68k, please set: dep-wait octave2.1-headers >= 1:2.1.73-17 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 09:23:35PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > > Chasing the long tai

binNMUs for gfortran transition

2008-03-10 Thread Riku Voipio
Chasing the long tail in gfortran transition.. The following packages need a binNMU with latest r-base-dev to get rid of atlas3/reblas3 depends. Aurel32, the list applies for kfreebsd-i386 as well. robustbase_0.2-8-1, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, i386, s390 quadprog_1.4.11-1, Transition to gfo

Re: maxima build failure on m68k

2008-03-10 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 01:14:14PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > I could not make sense of the build failure of maxima 5.13.0-3.1 on m68k > [1]. It seems to be a random build failure (please correct me if I am > wrong). Would it be possible to try compiling it again on m68k? > > http://bui

Re: Bug#469293: vzctl: vzmigrate corrupts user-ids of files

2008-03-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Version: 3.0.22-1 Hi I have now uploaded one new version for stable that fixes this critical issue. It turned out that this problem was fixed, but not for stable. Best regards, // Ola On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 02:24:37PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > Package: vzctl > Version: 3.0.11-13

maxima build failure on m68k

2008-03-10 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
I could not make sense of the build failure of maxima 5.13.0-3.1 on m68k [1]. It seems to be a random build failure (please correct me if I am wrong). Would it be possible to try compiling it again on m68k? http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=maxima&arch=m68k&ver=5.13.0-3.1&stamp=1205105278&fil

Re: binNMUs to keep haskell packages in sync

2008-03-10 Thread Bastian Blank
This gets offtopic on debian-release. Please follow to debian-devel. On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:55:15PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 09.03.2008, 23:02 +0100 schrieb Bastian Blank: > > On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 07:42:59PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > haskell libraries have