On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:53:47AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >> Please remove dcc. For more details see:
> >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/01/msg00172.html
> >
> > Ack for the removal. Upstream told us that the outdated version in
> > Etch causes serious
Hi,
On Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 07:44:00 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please hint user-setup 1.18; it fixes an important regression brought in
> with 1.17.
unblocked.
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer |
Hi
Please schedule binNMUs for all reverse dependencies of libpcre3 on all
architectures. There seems to be an ABI change in the last upstream:
dep-wait (libpcre3-dev >= 7.6-1)
Cheers
Luk
Original Message
Subject: Bug#463413: problem solved by recompiling the package !
Resent-
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> Please remove dcc. For more details see:
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/01/msg00172.html
>
> Ack for the removal. Upstream told us that the outdated version in
> Etch causes serious problems inside the DCC network and upgrading
> to a new version is not
Hi,
please hint user-setup 1.18; it fixes an important regression brought in
with 1.17.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCR
Sven Joachim wrote:
> I have another idea: let giflib build a dummy package libungif4g that
> depends on libgif4 and version the `Conflicts' and `Replaces' of libgif4 on
> libungif4g. That way libgif4 could work around the lack of versioned
> `Provides' in dpkg, and there's no hurry to update all
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:23:56PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> can you please approve loop-aes 3.2b-1lenny1 in t-p-u?
Hint added.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Debian Release Assis
Hi release team,
can you please approve loop-aes 3.2b-1lenny1 in t-p-u?
This basically resurrects 3.1b-2 (which was previously
in testing) for d-i beta1 -
loop-aes (3.2b-1lenny1) testing; urgency=low
.
* Resurrect modules for 2.6.22-3.
.
* This package was previously removed from testi
[Please CC me on replies. Thanks]
Dear release team,
Please bump the urgency of firebird2.0/2.0.3.12981.ds1-5, uploaded some
hours ago, to "high" as it closes security bug. Here's the changelog
since -4, which migrated today (yay!)
firebird2.0 (2.0.3.12981.ds1-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Re
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:58:00AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> Am Montag, den 04.02.2008, 23:32 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:46:05PM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > > please schedule a binNMU for gst0.10-python on all archs against
> > > libgstreamer0.10-0 (>
On 2008-02-05 17:50 +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-02-05, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Today a version of imlib11¹ built against libgif4 was uploaded to
>> unstable, and I noticed that it can't be installed because emacs21,
>
> woops. My fault I guess. didn't put that much into
On 2008-02-05, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today a version of imlib11¹ built against libgif4 was uploaded to
> unstable, and I noticed that it can't be installed because emacs21,
woops. My fault I guess. didn't put that much into the change. I can
also revert imlib11 if preferred by
Today a version of imlib11¹ built against libgif4 was uploaded to
unstable, and I noticed that it can't be installed because emacs21,
emacs22-gtk and icewm all depend on libungif4g (>= 4.1.4) which
conflicts against libgif4.
Although libgif4 provides libungif4g, this does not help much, since
dpkg
Am Montag, den 04.02.2008, 23:32 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:46:05PM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
>
> > please schedule a binNMU for gst0.10-python on all archs against
> > libgstreamer0.10-0 (>= 0.10.17) and libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 (>=
> > 0.10.17). The ol
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Daniel Rus Morales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-04 18:28]:
I'd prefer to contact the upstream author and suggest them to use the
current:revision:age schema.
I am afraid this will take much longer than is need for getting the gfortran
transition into lenny.
On Mon, 04 Feb 08 12:40, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Good question.
> > At least for KDE 4 Apps there is no Problem -- kdesu from KDE 4 is
> > always around if kdelibs5 (the KDE 4 libraries) is installed.
> > When you have a KDE 3 Desktop kdebase-bin is no
16 matches
Mail list logo