Re: em8300 REMOVED from testing

Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 21/01/2008, Nicolas Boullis wrote: >> I feel slightly puzzled by this package removal. OK, there is a bug >> filed against the package, with severity serious. > > Then don't be puzzled any longer. > >> But the bug is tagged "unreproducible", and the submitter did not >

Re: em8300 REMOVED from testing

Quoting Nicolas Boullis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > bug "moreinfo" have helpped? Or should I have downgraded its severity > for lack of information? I would have downgraded the bug to "important", based on the assumption that "in the package maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for r

Re: libcdio stable update for CVE-2007-6613

Hi Nicolas, * Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-22 00:40]: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:31:39PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: [...] > > Unfortunately the vulnerability described above is not important enough > > to get it fixed via regular security update in Debian stable. It does > > not wa

Re: Please drop icedove-locale-uk, mozilla-thunderbird-locale-uk & thunderbird-traybiff from testing

Julien Goodwin wrote: > * mozilla-thunderbird-locale-uk - Ditto, but a transition for the below > * icedove-locale-uk - Hasn't been updated for the 2.0 release (9 months ago) Hi, too bad i didn't spottet that one myself.. however, the locaes for 2.0 are now part of the icedove-l10n locale package

Re: libcdio stable update for CVE-2007-6613

Hi Nico and others, On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:31:39PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was > published for libcdio some time ago. > > CVE-2007-6613[0]: > | Stack-based buffer overflow in the print_iso9660_recurse function in > | iso-info

Re: em8300 REMOVED from testing

On 21/01/2008, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > I feel slightly puzzled by this package removal. OK, there is a bug > filed against the package, with severity serious. Then don't be puzzled any longer. > But the bug is tagged "unreproducible", and the submitter did not > reply to my last questions. Is t

Re: em8300 REMOVED from testing

Hi, On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:39:13PM -0700, Debian testing watch wrote: > FYI: The status of the em8300 source package > in Debian's testing distribution has changed. > > Previous version: 0.16.3-1 > Current version: (not in testing) > Hint:

Re: Python 2.5 as release goal

On Jan 21, 2008 3:24 PM, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and the list of bugs that need to be fixed to work with python as 2.5 > is here: > http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20071005.180427.1dddb386.en.html Er, how do i clipboarded? The correct link is: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Python 2.5 as release goal

Hi Release Team, As far as i can tell, nobody has brought up upgrading the default Python to 2.5 as a release goal. Joss outlined the steps necessary for the transition here: http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20071005.180427.1dddb386.en.html and the list of bugs that need to be fixed to w

Bug#461236: boost vulnerabilities (was [pkg-boost-commits] r14144 - in boost/trunk: ...)

On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 05:32:03PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hi all, Hi, > I do understand that derivative distributions such as Ubuntu do put > their own release entries in there. I imagine the Ubuntu users > understand that and can differentiate the Ubuntu release from the > Debian one

Re: networkmanager binNMU for libnl1-pre8/6

Cyril Brulebois wrote: On 21/01/2008, Paul Wise wrote: network-manager needs a binNMU on all arches because it still depends on libnl1-pre8 on some architectures and libnl1-pre6 on others. The new package name is libnl1. Speaking of which, it isn't built everywhere, so you might want to set a