Re: binNMUs for cli-common 0.5.5

2008-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > Am Samstag, den 12.01.2008, 00:15 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:04:59AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > > Hi, > > > please schedule binNMUs for the following packages for cli-common 0.5.5. > > > Bec

Re: hint for vice/1.22-2

2008-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:26:59PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > Please hint vice 1.22-2 into testing, it's blocked by s390 and sparc. As > none of them in the > archs field for now, it is ready for migration. That's not how hinting works. You need to sort out with the porters why these pac

hint for vice/1.22-2

2008-01-12 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
Hi, Please hint vice 1.22-2 into testing, it's blocked by s390 and sparc. As none of them in the archs field for now, it is ready for migration. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Requesting binNMU for packagesearch due to changes in APT

2008-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 02:16:08PM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote: > packagesearch_2.2.6, apt ABI changed (see below), 2, all > Please schedule a binNMU for packagesearch for all architectures. Those were already scheduled days ago - and they're all failing to build due to what looks like bug #4588

Re: Requesting binNMU for packagesearch due to changes in APT

2008-01-12 Thread Riku Voipio
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 02:16:08PM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote: > packagesearch_2.2.6, apt ABI changed (see below), 2, all > Please schedule a binNMU for packagesearch for all architectures. binNMU was scheduled, but packagesearch failed to build on most systems due to bug #458884. so binNMU is

Requesting binNMU for packagesearch due to changes in APT

2008-01-12 Thread Benjamin Mesing
packagesearch_2.2.6, apt ABI changed (see below), 2, all Please schedule a binNMU for packagesearch for all architectures. Thanks, Benjamin Forwarded Message From: Otavio Salvador To: packagesearch-packages.debian.org Subject: A binary NMU is required for packagesearch due a

Re: Idea for dealing with transitions

2008-01-12 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11261 March 1977, Margarita Manterola wrote: > Implement a new file, that works similarly to the hints file, but that > causes uploads to unstable for selected packages to be rejected. Thus, > if a maintainer uploads, it won't get through so that it won't get in > the way of the transition. >

Re: Idea for dealing with transitions

2008-01-12 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Petter Reinholdtsen [Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:44:45 +0100]: > One issue to try to avoid is for such blocks to last longer than the > transition they are supposed to help. Would it be an idea for the > format to include a reference to the transition, for example using a > package and version number t

Re: Memory leak in SUNRPC code

2008-01-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi release managers, On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:59:53AM +, Andre Cruz wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch2 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > I've already submitted a patch upstream and it has been integrated. > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5541 > > It

Re: binNMUs for cli-common 0.5.5

2008-01-12 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Am Samstag, den 12.01.2008, 00:15 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:04:59AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > Hi, > > please schedule binNMUs for the following packages for cli-common 0.5.5. > > Because of a bug in older version dh_makeclilibs created broken clilibs > > co

Re: binNMUs for cli-common 0.5.5

2008-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:04:59AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > Hi, > please schedule binNMUs for the following packages for cli-common 0.5.5. > Because of a bug in older version dh_makeclilibs created broken clilibs > control files. > > monodoc 1.2.6-2 Arch: all packages, not binNMUable. > g