Re: binNMUs for cli-common 0.5.5

2008-01-08 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2008, 07:05 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Dröge: > Hi, > please schedule binNMUs for the following packages for cli-common 0.5.5. > Because of a bug in older version dh_makeclilibs created broken clilibs > control files. > > monodoc 1.2.6-2 > gmime 2.2.15-1 > taglib-sharp 2.0.2.0

binNMUs for cli-common 0.5.5

2008-01-08 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Hi, please schedule binNMUs for the following packages for cli-common 0.5.5. Because of a bug in older version dh_makeclilibs created broken clilibs control files. monodoc 1.2.6-2 gmime 2.2.15-1 taglib-sharp 2.0.2.0-2 banshee 0.13.2+dfsg-1 Thanks and bye signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein

Re: Sid: strange dependence conflict xinetd and openbsd-inetd

2008-01-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 08/01/2008, David wrote: > So, am I silly or, how in heaven's name can xinetd provide > inet-superserver and conflict with inet-superserver? (conflicts with > the same package that it provides??). See 7.5.2 under http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replac

Re: Sid: strange dependence conflict xinetd and openbsd-inetd

2008-01-08 Thread David
Thank you for the replies > $ apt-cache show xinetd | egrep 'Conflicts|Provides' > Provides: inet-superserver > Conflicts: inet-superserver > > So, am I silly or, how in heaven's name can xinetd provide inet-superserver and conflict with inet-superserver? (conflicts with the same package that it

Re: Sid: strange dependence conflict xinetd and openbsd-inetd

2008-01-08 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2008-01-08 David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From long ago, xinetd is due for upgrade (from version 1:2.3.14-1.1 to 1: > 2.3.14-5). But, when I select upgrade, synaptic prompts to remove > openbsd-inetd. > I have checked the dependences and conflicts of both xinetd and > openbsd-inetd and I d

Re: Sid: strange dependence conflict xinetd and openbsd-inetd

2008-01-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 08/01/2008, David wrote: > From long ago, xinetd is due for upgrade (from version 1:2.3.14-1.1 > to 1:2.3.14-5). But, when I select upgrade, synaptic prompts to > remove openbsd-inetd. > > I have checked the dependences and conflicts of both xinetd and > openbsd-inetd and I do not see any reaso

Sid: strange dependence conflict xinetd and openbsd-inetd

2008-01-08 Thread David
>From long ago, xinetd is due for upgrade (from version 1:2.3.14-1.1 to 1: 2.3.14-5). But, when I select upgrade, synaptic prompts to remove openbsd-inetd. I have checked the dependences and conflicts of both xinetd and openbsd-inetd and I do not see any reason for this behaviour. Is there anythi

please allow ltsp 5.0.40~bzr20071229-1 into testing

2008-01-08 Thread vagrant
ltsp is again blocked from migrating into testing, likely due to the ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by default. it has been in unstable for 9 days now, without introducing new problems. please allow ltsp 5.0.40~bzr20071229-1 into testing, as it bring lt