Re: msort should be bin-NMUed for ICU 3.8

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 02:22:24PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > msort can be bin-NMUed for libicu38; it currently only depends on > libicu38 on i386 (the maintainer upload) and the rest is libicu36. It > already build-depends on libicu-dev so it should be bin-NMUable and > bin-NMUs should be sch

Re: Bug#458052: RM: unace-nonfree/stable [alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] -- ANAIS neither 64bit nor big-endian safe

Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 18:46 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes: >> Can you also include the security fix (patch 11) please? > > Sure. I also changed the Architecture field in debian/control to reflect > only i386/amd64 and uploaded the package again to mentors.d.n. > > I'll b

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Hi, On Sat Dec 29, 2007 at 00:20:15 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > The next revision of stable > should therefore be released at the mid of February or 48h before the > release of Etch, whatever comes first. ignore that one. i really should kill that from the skel directory.. Greetings Mart

Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.1r3 = An up-to-date version is at . We are preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian distribution (sarge) and will frequently send reports so people can actually comme

Re: Bug#458052: RM: unace-nonfree/stable [alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] -- ANAIS neither 64bit nor big-endian safe

Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 18:46 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes: > Can you also include the security fix (patch 11) please? Sure. I also changed the Architecture field in debian/control to reflect only i386/amd64 and uploaded the package again to mentors.d.n. I'll be glad if you sponsored this upload.

Re: Accepted boost 1.34.1-4 (source all i386)

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 08:23:10PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:32:09PM +, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > Changes: > > boost (1.34.1-4) unstable; urgency=low > > . > >* Merged Steve Langasek's -2.1 and -2.2 changes into > >the experimental -3 version. > > Was

Re: Accepted boost 1.34.1-4 (source all i386)

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:32:09PM +, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Changes: > boost (1.34.1-4) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Merged Steve Langasek's -2.1 and -2.2 changes into >the experimental -3 version. Was this supposed to be uploaded to unstable? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Bug#458052: RM: unace-nonfree/stable [alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] -- ANAIS neither 64bit nor big-endian safe

Fabian Greffrath wrote: > retitle 458052 RM: unace-nonfree/stable [alpha arm hppa ia64 mips mipsel > powerpc s390 sparc] -- ANAIS not big-endian safe > thanks > > Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 14:41 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes: >> Can you please upload a fixed package to stable and retitle the >> bugre

Re: Bug#458052: RM: unace-nonfree/stable [alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] -- ANAIS neither 64bit nor big-endian safe

retitle 458052 RM: unace-nonfree/stable [alpha arm hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] -- ANAIS not big-endian safe thanks Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 14:41 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes: > Can you please upload a fixed package to stable and retitle the > bugreport accordingly? Sure. The fixed p

Re: Bug#458052: RM: unace-nonfree/stable [alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] -- ANAIS neither 64bit nor big-endian safe

Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 11:28 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes: >> Do you think the patch to fix the 64-bit issue is small enough to have >> it included in the next point release? > > Yes: The patch itself is <4kB and affects only one single file. Can you please upload a fixe

msort should be bin-NMUed for ICU 3.8

Hi, msort can be bin-NMUed for libicu38; it currently only depends on libicu38 on i386 (the maintainer upload) and the rest is libicu36. It already build-depends on libicu-dev so it should be bin-NMUable and bin-NMUs should be scheduled on anything except i386. This is the last package needing ac

Re: Bug#458052: RM: unace-nonfree/stable [alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] -- ANAIS neither 64bit nor big-endian safe

Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 11:28 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes: > Do you think the patch to fix the 64-bit issue is small enough to have > it included in the next point release? Yes: The patch itself is <4kB and affects only one single file. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Re: Bug#458052: RM: unace-nonfree/stable [alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] -- ANAIS neither 64bit nor big-endian safe

Fabian Greffrath wrote: > package: ftp.debian.org > > Hi! Hi > A code audit revealed that unace-nonfree 2.5-1 in stable is neither > 64bit- nor big-endian clean. > > Revision -3 in unstable is 64bit-clean but still not big-endian-clean > (will file another bug report). For revision -3 I enabled

Re: Please unblock iso-codes

Tobias Toedter wrote: > Hi, > > if the Installer team does not object, please add the following > hint: > > unblock iso-codes/1.7-1 unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please unblock iso-codes

Hi, if the Installer team does not object, please add the following hint: unblock iso-codes/1.7-1 Regards, Tobias -- Tobias Toedter | God, I ask for patience -- and I want it right now! Hamburg, Germany | signature.asc Description: PGP signature