Thanks anibal,
for the explanation, my mail setup is b0rked and can't send signed
messages, hope to fix that soon !
xfsprogs was uploaded just too short for the freeze, it fixes many
bugs, and is much faster, it should go to stable.
On Dec 19, 2007 2:26 PM, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:41:26PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> As I said to Steve, all the actual breakage I can find evidence for
> involved gcc3.x, there may not be a problem with the various 4.x
> series and boost. But I sure wouldn't rely on it.
Well, here's your chance to find some ABI bre
Hello,
Niv just asked me to send this message on his behalf.
He's sitting a couple of meters away from my desk in the SGI Melbourne
office.
Please allow xfsprogs 2.9.4-2 in testing.
Anibal
--
On behalf of the SGI folks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Dec 18, 2007 12:48 AM, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is completely insane. "In the past" there was the gcc3 to gcc4
> C++ ABI transition, and that's it.
? gcc3 to gcc4 wasn't a deliberate C++ ABI transition. (I was an
active member of gcc upstream at the time.) The major v
On Dec 18, 2007 12:45 AM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:46:31PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > Back when monotone used a bunch of boost modules that included
> > libraries (as opposed to just headers), the upstream mailing list
> > would regularly get repor
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 04:06:25PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Maybe it's just a matter of uploading the i386 binary package together
> with the source package (without orig.tar.gz) and reuploading the other
> binary packages afterwards?
I just received the following from the queue daemon (wrapping
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 14:44, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm writing to all of you to let you know about an impending libclamav
> soname transition. So long as your application doesn't use any private
> structures or functions from clamav, you shouldn't need to do anything.
>
> My first
Hello,
I'm writing to all of you to let you know about an impending libclamav
soname transition. So long as your application doesn't use any private
structures or functions from clamav, you shouldn't need to do anything.
My first round of testing shows that all packages build from source
against
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
> On 17-12-2007 18:35, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> On 11236 March 1977, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:48:48AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
So, as maintainer of C++ packages that use apt and are involved in apt
transitions every so of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-12-2007 18:35, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11236 March 1977, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:48:48AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
>>> So, as maintainer of C++ packages that use apt and are involved in apt
>>> transitions every so o
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:28:50AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 05:45:05PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The attached patch works quite a bit better, and is what I'll upload if it
> > finishes checking out here.
> Nope, that patch was also total crap. But this patch g
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 07:46:31AM +, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> (apologies for breaking threads, I'm not subscribed and can't hack the
> References line)
>
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> > > (Though I'm surprised that going from gcc 4.1 to 4.2 is really an ABI
> > > change.)
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:46:31PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > > (Though I'm surprised that going from gcc 4.1 to 4.2 is really an ABI
> > > change.)
> > It's not, except that the boost Debian packages are encoding the gcc version
> > in the soname by hand. This is wrong, but needs to be addr
(apologies for breaking threads, I'm not subscribed and can't hack the
References line)
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> > (Though I'm surprised that going from gcc 4.1 to 4.2 is really an ABI
> > change.)
>
> It's not, except that the boost Debian packages are encoding the gcc vers
14 matches
Mail list logo
