Re: zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-7

Mark Brown wrote: > Please allow zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-7 to enter testing. It has been in > unstable for 45 days now so should be safe enough. The changelog > against testing is: > > zlib (1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-7) unstable; urgency=low > > * Hard code uname to GNU so configure script can cope with non

zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-7

Please allow zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-7 to enter testing. It has been in unstable for 45 days now so should be safe enough. The changelog against testing is: zlib (1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-7) unstable; urgency=low * Hard code uname to GNU so configure script can cope with non-Linux ports (closes: #4486

Re: binNMUs for libdirectfb-1.0-0

On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:23:22AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > libsdl1.2_1.2.12-1, recompile against new libdirectfb-1.0-0, 1, alpha amd64 > arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc > directvnc_0.7.5-8, recompile against new libdirectfb-1.0-0, 2, alpha amd64 > arm hppa i386 ia64

Re: Upload of libept and apt transition

* Enrico Zini [Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:37:19 +0100]: > Frans told me there's an apt transition going on, but I'd like to upload > a fixed libept for #455748. > My plan is to upload tonight (about 6 hours from now) a new version, > urgency=low. If this is a bad idea, please let me know. (14:47 enri