Re: binNMUs needed for new pwlib 1.10.10

2007-10-09 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Kilian Krause wrote: > as pwlib 1.10.10 got out of NEW today, we'll need a few binNMUs to catch > the SONAME change for the following packs. > > with dep-wait 'libpt-dev (>= 1.10.10), libopenh323-dev (>= 1.18.0.dfsg-7+b1)' > on alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc > -

Re: Please let dhcp3 into testing

2007-10-09 Thread Luk Claes
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 02:10:04AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > Hi, Hi Andrew > I can see an unblock request for dhcp3 that was unsuccessful, probably > related to the version numbering twiddle that went on. unblocked. An unblock hint will only consider the exact version mentioned in the hint.

Please let dhcp3 into testing

2007-10-09 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi, I can see an unblock request for dhcp3 that was unsuccessful, probably related to the version numbering twiddle that went on. regards Andrew signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [SRM] multipath-tools-boot should run after udev

2007-10-09 Thread Guido Guenther
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:44:54PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > You should upload with a minimal patch against etch to proposed-updates. > The version number you propose is fine. Will do, thanks. > PS: I hope you included correct headers in the initscript for the version > in unstable? Sure. -- Gu

Re: rebuild of texmacs

2007-10-09 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > texmacs 1:1.0.6.11 failed to build on arm, m68k, sparc. According to the > build logs the problem seems to be a dependency issue on librsvg2-bin. > This package is available on all the architectures. For all I know this is > a temporary glitch and will go away with a

binNMUs needed for new pwlib 1.10.10

2007-10-09 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi, as pwlib 1.10.10 got out of NEW today, we'll need a few binNMUs to catch the SONAME change for the following packs. with dep-wait 'libpt-dev (>= 1.10.10)' on alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc - openh323 with dep-wait 'libpt-dev (>= 1.10.10), libopenh323-dev (

Re: Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact 1.11

2007-10-09 Thread Luk Claes
Otavio Salvador wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi RMs, Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact 1.11. This package has CJK fonts are needed for newer d-i. I believe it's safe to unfreeze this package usually because this udeb package is rel

Re: Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact 1.11

2007-10-09 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi RMs, > > Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact 1.11. > > This package has CJK fonts are needed for newer d-i. > I believe it's safe to unfreeze this package usually because > this udeb package is related with only

Re: Transition to directfb 1.0.1

2007-10-09 Thread Otavio Salvador
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to upload to unstable once I've been given green light. The > transition should be able to be handled by me uploading the packages > from experimental to unstable, and triggering binNMUs. >From d-i POV there's no problem in doing it. cdebconf h

Re: [SRM] multipath-tools-boot should run after udev

2007-10-09 Thread Luk Claes
Guido Guenther wrote: Hi, On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:05:30PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 schrieben Sie: Which is what the lenny package has (fixed in 0.4.7-3). I wonder if we should do an update for the next point release? Martin Zobel-Helas told me that that sho

[SRM] multipath-tools-boot should run after udev

2007-10-09 Thread Guido Guenther
Hi, On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:05:30PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 schrieben Sie: > > Which is what the lenny package has (fixed in 0.4.7-3). I wonder if we > > should do an update for the next point release? > > Martin Zobel-Helas told me that that should be done

Re: Bug#439272: sysprof: package not usable

2007-10-09 Thread Samuel Mimram
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05/10/2007): >> This bug [#439272] is marked "grave" and is not usable because of the >> missing library file. > >> Any fixes ? > > I'm suggesting a binNMU, since a rebuild looks like sufficient to update > the dependencies (in