Hi,
On Saturday 06 October 2007 13:26, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> I indeed didn't know about rtupdate - it seems to be missing on
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/
How about a wishlist bug with patch to add this to policy? :)
Or without the patch, "just" to be able to track
texmacs 1:1.0.6.11 failed to build on arm, m68k, sparc. According to the
build logs the problem seems to be a dependency issue on librsvg2-bin. This
package is available on all the architectures. For all I know this is a
temporary glitch and will go away with a rebuild. Could you please schedule
a
Le samedi 06 octobre 2007 à 13:26 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
> I indeed didn't know about rtupdate - it seems to be missing on
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/
As some changes that were accepted 7 months ago have still not been
integrated into the policy, I wouldn't
> Which is quite annoying for the transition of python to testing.
>
> I have sent you a multi-build patch for mod-wsgi. As you can see, it
> isn't that complicated. And for most packages in the list, the required
> changes are much simpler.
I indeed didn't know about rtupdate - it seems to be m
Le samedi 06 octobre 2007 à 12:21 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
> > Sorry , but there is a very good reason to do so: If the default python
> > version changes running applications with mod-wsgi will badly fail.
> > Therefore it depends in a relaxed way (python <<2.5, but >=2.4) on the
> > actual
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le samedi 06 octobre 2007 à 09:07 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
>>> Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 20:04 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
The following packages should also work with python2.5 after a round of
binNMUs, as some dependen
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 06 octobre 2007 à 09:07 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
>> Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 20:04 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
>>> The following packages should also work with python2.5 after a round of
>>> binNMUs, as some dependencies were relaxed in python
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:32:10AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> it currently prevents ACE to migrate into testing:
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=diagnostics
> This is due to the long double transition.
> diagnostics_0.1, 1, Rebuild against ace_5.4.7-13, alpha amd64 arm
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 07:19:17AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> See below, looks like a binNMU
Rather, a give-back; this isn't a rebuild of the package in question because
the package has never successfully built, so calling it a "binNMU" is
somewhat confusing.
Builds scheduled for amd64, m68
Le samedi 06 octobre 2007 à 09:07 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 20:04 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> > The following packages should also work with python2.5 after a round of
> > binNMUs, as some dependencies were relaxed in python-support 0.7.4:
> >
Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 20:04 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> The following packages should also work with python2.5 after a round of
> binNMUs, as some dependencies were relaxed in python-support 0.7.4:
> dia
> exaile
> k3d
You can add:
mod-wsgi
which in
11 matches
Mail list logo
