unbelievable

Debian-release best x x x for free today4free dot cn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cowdancer migration to testing needs manual intervention

On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 09:10:53AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > According to qa.debian.org page, I think the ancient version of > qemubuilder which was accidentally built for all arches is blocking > 0.41 from migrating to testing. qemu is only available on select set > of architectures, and thu

cowdancer migration to testing needs manual intervention

Hi, According to qa.debian.org page, I think the ancient version of qemubuilder which was accidentally built for all arches is blocking 0.41 from migrating to testing. qemu is only available on select set of architectures, and thus cowdancer no longer generates binaries for those architectures.

Re: usplash-theme-debian arch update

* Otavio Salvador [Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:29:44 -0300]: > Why not marking it for removal from lenny and later let it go in > wouldn't make it? Nope, all architectures *present in unstable* must be in sync. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian

Re: usplash-theme-debian arch update

Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 15:28:45 +0200, David Härdeman wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the arch list for usplash-theme-debian changed between versions 4 and 3. >> Now the package is no longer migrated to testing because of the "missing" >> arch package. Can the

binNMU request for yate

Hello, Please schedule binNMUs for yate. yate-openh323 depends on libopenh323 which until recently had too strict dependencies. This -along with a sourceful Asterisk upload- will hopefully allow yate to enter testing while openh323 FTBFS on unstable because of a binutils bug on mips/mipsel (##440

Re: usplash-theme-debian arch update

On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 15:28:45 +0200, David Härdeman wrote: > Hi, > > the arch list for usplash-theme-debian changed between versions 4 and 3. > Now the package is no longer migrated to testing because of the "missing" > arch package. Can the RM's fix this by removing the extra arch packages >

Re: libacpi Architecture: mismatch (Was: Some of your Debian packagesmight need attention)

Hi, * Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-26 15:39]: > Lucas Nussbaum wrote, Wednesday, September 26, 2007 2:01 PM > >On 26/09/07 at 12:53 +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > [...] > >>> === libacpi: > >>> = This package has not been in testing for 79 days. > >>> = This package has not been able to

usplash-theme-debian arch update

Hi, the arch list for usplash-theme-debian changed between versions 4 and 3. Now the package is no longer migrated to testing because of the "missing" arch package. Can the RM's fix this by removing the extra arch packages from testing? -- David Härdeman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

build failure of gpredict on sparc

gpredict failed to build on sparc (only) two weeks ago as libcurl* was not installable. The dependency is fixed but the build has not been retried. I emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] but nothing has happened. Is there anything else I can/should do? Is there anything the RMs can do? thanks Hamish -- Ham

Re: libacpi Architecture: mismatch (Was: Some of your Debian packagesmight need attention)

Lucas Nussbaum wrote, Wednesday, September 26, 2007 2:01 PM On 26/09/07 at 12:53 +0200, Nico Golde wrote: [...] > === libacpi: > = This package has not been in testing for 79 days. > = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable > to testing for 79 days. > See

Re: libacpi Architecture: mismatch (Was: Some of your Debian packages might need attention)

On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 15:01:34 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > The package is not supposed to build on arm and hppa (since it's using > Architecture: i386 ia64 amd64), but some parts of the infrastructure > think it should be built there (dak? britney?). > > Release team, what's the correct way

libacpi Architecture: mismatch (Was: Some of your Debian packages might need attention)

(Ccing -release@ as I'm not sure of what to do here) On 26/09/07 at 12:53 +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi Lucas, > thanks again for this service! > * DDPOMail robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-26 09:35]: > > The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) > > you maintain in Debia

Please give back grass on sparc

Mesa has been finally built on sparc on 9/17 and now grass should resolve all its dependencies and build to finally migrate to lenny. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fw: Finding a date for the Debian QA meeting in extremadura

Hi, I forgot to Cc -release@, and there might be people interested that don't read [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Forwarded message from Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:54:20 +0200 Subject: Finding a date

Please give-back xine-lib on arm and mipsel

reason for mipsel: transient dependency problem: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following inf