On 8/21/07, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:23:29PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I use 'advi' and care about it, and I noticed that it's not in the
> > list[1]. Is the list comprehensive?
>
> It is up to bug / strangeness in the interested packages :-)
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:10:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:> On Sun, Aug 19,
2007 at 11:52:52AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On 2007-08-18, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > >> Hi folks
> > >>
> > >> The linu
> * before A DNS lookup
> (it might be that the implementation of RFC3484 as described
>in the libc6 change "2006-05-18 David Woodhouse" as found in
>/usr/share/doc/libc6/changelog.gz might have solved this particular
>problem)
Partly. It fixed the issue of clients trying to
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:52:52AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2007-08-18, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >> Hi folks
> >>
> >> The linux-latest-2.6 update in 4.0r1 was incomplete. arm still have the
> >> versi
Hi,
nfs-utils 1:1.1.1~git-20070709-3 fixes a bug that results in obscure and
rather hard-to-track-down issues compared to the version currently in
testing. Given that it's been five days in unstable (with no known
regressions over the version in testing), would it be possible to bump its
urgency?
Hi,
On Mon Aug 20, 2007 at 19:07:50 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you please hint openssl into testing? It has a udeb.
Debian Installer Team, comments?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi,
Could you please hint openssl into testing? It has a udeb.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:23:29PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I use 'advi' and care about it, and I noticed that it's not in the
> list[1]. Is the list comprehensive?
It is up to bug / strangeness in the interested packages :-)
In particular I just noticed that advi does not declare a direct
b
Hi,
> Hi releasers,
> we, members of the OCaml team, feel ready to start transitioning
> packages from OCaml 3.09.2 to OCaml 3.10 in unstable. A list of the
> involved packages is available at [1].
>
> I'm hereby asking for your permission to go forward with this
> transition.
I'm not a releas
* Damyan Ivanov [Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:32:33 +0300]:
> Request to remove it from unstable is under way.
Hello Damyan. For packages meant to be removed from unstable, we just
let them disappear from sid first, and they disappear from testing
automatically afterwards.
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó
Dear release managers,
Please remove firebird1.5 and its binary packages from testing. The
package is unsupported by upstream and has security bugs[1] that are not
fixable by the Debian maintainer (yours truly).
Request to remove it from unstable is under way.
The current version in testing is 1
11 matches
Mail list logo
