-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please RM team,
Could you please schedule binNMUs to stable for rootskel?
This is needed due klibc soname change.
TIA,
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello RM team,
Please add the following set of hints:
unblock busybox/1:1.1.3-5
Please remove gnu-fdisk from block list since it doesn't build udebs
anymore.
Thanks in advance,
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- ---
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 09:29:10PM +0200, Julien Louis wrote:
> The i386 package of mpop version 1.0.5-1etch1 has been build accidentally
> in a sid build environment. This results in a uninstallable package for
> i386 users of mpop. A binNMU is enough to closes #438538. Could you
> please, schedu
Hi,
The i386 package of mpop version 1.0.5-1etch1 has been build accidentally
in a sid build environment. This results in a uninstallable package for
i386 users of mpop. A binNMU is enough to closes #438538. Could you
please, schedule a binNMU on i386 for this package ?
Thanks
--
14:32 Win 98
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> In Etch we still have programs in rootskel-bootfloppy that are compiled
> against or directly use klibc. Those will break if there is any kind of
> (ABI?) change in klibc.
>
> The safe solution would be to also upload a stable update for rootskel built
>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 08:05:44AM +, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> Please binNMU gnome-python-extras package on all architectures
> (rebuild will add support for python2.5)
> gnome-python-extras-2.14.3, Rebuild to get python2.5 extensions, 1, alpha
> amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:24:32PM +, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> Please binNMU gnome-python package on all architectures (rebuild will add
> support for python2.5)
> gnome-python-2.18.2-1, Rebuild to get python2.5 extensions, 1, alpha amd64
> arm hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc m6
Joey Schulze wrote:
Luk Claes wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[ Assuming is not too late to proposed release goals of course ]
Hi, a long time ago we were wondering to have DEBIAN/md5sums generated
for all packages in the archive ... and we are still wondering!
Can we make it a release goal fo
Luk Claes wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> [ Assuming is not too late to proposed release goals of course ]
>> Hi, a long time ago we were wondering to have DEBIAN/md5sums generated
>> for all packages in the archive ... and we are still wondering!
>> Can we make it a release goal for lenny?
>
chiark-utils_4.1.10, Rebuild against libgmp3c2, +b1, alpha amd64 arm hppa
hurd-i386 i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
Thanks.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
One lo
Please binNMU gnome-python-extras package on all architectures
(rebuild will add support for python2.5)
gnome-python-extras-2.14.3, Rebuild to get python2.5 extensions, 1, alpha amd64
arm hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc m68k
--
:wq!
pgphulDeuFlLT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Aurelien Jarno [Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:17:36 +0200]:
> Hi,
> glibc 2.6.1-1 will reach 10 days into unstable very soon and is in a
> good shape to go into testing. We are only missing the alpha package,
> but the buildd maintainer has been pinged.
> Could you please unblock it?
> FYI this version
[ fully quoting my original request, for the sake of context
preservation ]
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 09:04:13AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> [ Assuming is not too late to propose release goals of course ]
>> Hi, a long time ago we were wondering to have DEBIAN/md5sums ge
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[ Assuming is not too late to proposed release goals of course ]
Hi, a long time ago we were wondering to have DEBIAN/md5sums generated
for all packages in the archive ... and we are still wondering!
Can we make it a release goal for lenny?
With more than 600 issues,
14 matches
Mail list logo
