On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 09:59:53AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Some sources need to be bin NMUed against the new APT:
> adept/2.1.3
> apt-move/4.2.27-1
> apt-watch/0.3.2-9
> aptitude/0.4.5.4-1
> aptsh/0.0.7
> debtags/1.7.3
> debtags-edit/1.3
> libept/0.5.10
> gnome-apt/0.4.9-2
> libapt
On 7/26/07, Christian Holm Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If developers write their `configure' script properly, it shouldn't be
too much of a problem. The idea is, check for libraries, adding them to
the `LIBS' variable (AC_CHECK_LIB does that), and at the end you check
for missing fun
Hi all,
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:49 -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
...
> I've been using this hack for getarg, building it into the base Cernlib
> library "libkernlib" only in the case of compiling with gfortran:
...
> Of course, this won't help your configure script not
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:28:41AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Stable Debian-Release,
> Hi Security Team,
>
Not speaking in any official capacity here, but:
Lets have a look at the vulnerabilities which still affect etch:
CVE-2007-2022 - "Unspecified vulnerability ... unspecified impact and
Hi,
portmap on hppa has been built against libc6 2.5-9, which produces
broken PIE binaries. The problem has been fixed in 2.5-11 and later.
Could you please do the following binNMU?
portmap_6.0-3 , 1 , Rebuild against libc6 (>= 2.5-11) , hppa
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno
It holds a fix for a nasty crash in nscd, the patch is a one liner
that is in production on alioth for a while now without known issues.
I thought we already sent a mail, it appears we didn't, so you'll find
the package in etch-p-u already.
CHeers,
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
Hi!
Kdebase is uninstallable. It needs a binNMU for the openexr ldbl
namechange.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 07:57:23PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Can someone please schedule binNMUs for the following:
> gretl_1.6.5-1, 1, Rebuild against libmpfr1ldbl, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64
> mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
> wcalc_2.2.2-2, 1 , Rebuild against libmpfr1ldbl, alpha amd64 arm
[Bart Martens]
> Going via Volatile and/or Backports is interesting, but that does not
> inform Stable users who don't have Volatile or Backports in
> their /etc/apt/sources.list. So I guess that many Debian Stable users
> are still unknownly using an insecure version of the Flash plugin,
> insta
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 15:37:36 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 13:16]:
> > can you please schedule a give back for obconf on all archs?
> > It depended on openbox-dev on build time which was in NEW.
>
> ping? I saw that obconf was build for sparc ye
Hi,
* Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-26 15:41]:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 15:37:36 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 13:16]:
> > > can you please schedule a give back for obconf on all archs?
> > > It depended on openbox-dev on build time which w
Hi,
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 13:16]:
> can you please schedule a give back for obconf on all archs?
> It depended on openbox-dev on build time which was in NEW.
ping? I saw that obconf was build for sparc yesterday but
not on the other archs that's why I am not sure if this
m
gpe-contacts_0.46-2, Rebuild against libeventdb2, +b1, alpha amd64 arm hppa
i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaaand, blame packages.qa.d.o for not being up to date. Apologies. :-)
Well, the upload preceded the message to debian-release by seconds, so
it was pretty up to date. :-) Thanks for the replies.
--Jay
* Adeodato Simó [Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:16:59 +0200]:
> After a closer look, I was expecting a nip2 upload, but I don't see one,
> is there one planned? You'll need one in order to change, at least, the
> build-depends on libvips10-dev to libvips-dev.
Aaaand, blame packages.qa.d.o for not being up t
* Adeodato Simó [Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:09:06 +0200]:
> * Jay Berkenbilt [Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:57:31 -0400]:
> > Hello. Unless things have changed since the last time I did this type
> > of upload, then about 10 days from now, there will need to be a hint
> > so that vips and nip2 to can transition
* Jay Berkenbilt [Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:57:31 -0400]:
> Hello. Unless things have changed since the last time I did this type
> of upload, then about 10 days from now, there will need to be a hint
> so that vips and nip2 to can transition to testing together. The new
> vips upload includes libvips
Hello. Unless things have changed since the last time I did this type
of upload, then about 10 days from now, there will need to be a hint
so that vips and nip2 to can transition to testing together. The new
vips upload includes libvips12 which replaces libvips10c2a, and
libvips-dev replaces lib
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007, Loïc Minier wrote:
> aptitude/0.4.5.4-1
A new version was uploaded; seemingly after apt was built.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 02:10:32PM +1000, Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi RMs,
>
> Please schedule a give-back for synfigstudio on arm as it FTBFS due to
Scheduled. However it may be due to a lack of memory (and swap) of the build
daemon. We'll see.
> an ICE, the toolchain has had updates and [EMAIL PROTE
Hi Stable Debian-Release,
Hi Security Team,
On 11 July I was notified of a newer upstream release of the Adobe Flash
plugin. I updated flashplugin-nonfree in Unstable on the same day.
On 12 July I uploaded flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.48.0.1etch1 to Stable. I
did not go via the Security Team because
21 matches
Mail list logo
