Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22/07/2007):
> The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did not
> result any comments.
> If you have suggestions, critique, or you are busy but accept NMU'ing
> your packages for gfortran transition.. please speak now.
Hi,
I'd like to know th
Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lintian no complains if the soname and the package name are different.
> Do the libblas.so.3 et. al. sonames, which are also alternatives shared
> with atlas, need changing? As these also name alternatives, there is no
> natural way to satisfy lintian h
Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello release managers,
Hi Martin
> a while ago I uploaded a new postgresql to s-p-u. Unfortunately the
> recent security fixes were a bit too eager and broke polymorphic SQL
> function return values. I'd like to get this rectified.
>
> Details are in the changelog and in th
Lintian no complains if the soname and the package name are different.
Do the libblas.so.3 et. al. sonames, which are also alternatives
shared with atlas, need changing? As these also name alternatives,
there is no natural way to satisfy lintian here.
Take care,
Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Greetings! Has the gf library naming proposal been accepted?
Take care,
Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Camm,
>
> your email is bounding for me!
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 06:14:46PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Sure. I suppose we still have testsuite failures in
> > blas/lapack
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:47:49AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> I suppose everyone is aware that -ffloat-store is a real performance
> loser, especially on slower machines. Would it be preferable to fix
> the testers to not be fooled by extra precision?
Isn't the -ffloat-store flag removed in rec
Greetings!
I suppose everyone is aware that -ffloat-store is a real performance
loser, especially on slower machines. Would it be preferable to fix
the testers to not be fooled by extra precision?
Take care,
Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Camm,
>
> your email is bounding for me!
>
Greetings, and thanks! OK this is ready for upload.
Do you or any others know of a resolution of
src/drotmg.f:101.15:
GO TO IGO,(120,150,180,210)
1
Warning: Obsolete: Assigned GOTO statement at (1)
src/drotmg.f:107.72:
Hello release managers,
a while ago I uploaded a new postgresql to s-p-u. Unfortunately the
recent security fixes were a bit too eager and broke polymorphic SQL
function return values. I'd like to get this rectified.
Details are in the changelog and in the bug report; do you need any
other inform
9 matches
Mail list logo
